Keywords
Visioscope Method
How to Cite
Abstract
The regular use of adhesive systems has revolutionized many aspects of restorative and preventive dentistry. Attitudes toward cavity preparation have changed since adhesive systems began to be used instead of mechanical retention. Using this technique, it may prevent micro-leakage as the main dental problem responsible for many cases of secondary caries. Therefore, adhesives are of crucial importance in esthetic restorative dentistry. The degree of penetration of IV, V and VII generation adhesive systems in different types of teeth was studied using the visioscopic method. It was shown that the adhesive system of the VII generation compared to the adhesive systems of the IV and V generations is characterized by a reliably low penetration, which may be the basis of a better result.
References
V. Grover et al., “ISP Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for the management of Dentin Hypersensitivity.,” J Indian Soc Periodontol, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 307–333, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_233_22.
Y. F. Alfaawaz et al., “Adhesive Bond Integrity of Experimental Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporated Dentin Adhesive: An SEM, EDX, μTBS, and Rheometric Analysis.,” Scanning, vol. 2022, p. 3477886, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3477886.
H. A. Abdullah, Z. A. Al-Ibraheemi, Z. A. Hanoon, and J. Haider, “Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: An In Vitro Study.,” Int J Dent, vol. 2022, p. 2830299, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/2830299.
Z. Khamverdi, N. Karimian, M. Farhadian, and H. Gheitouli, “Effect of Contamination with Hemostatic Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin Using G-Premio and Single Bond Universal Adhesives.,” Front Dent, vol. 18, p. 27, 2021, doi: 10.18502/fid.v18i27.6937.
T. Sriamporn, N. Thamrongananskul, and A. Klaisiri, “The Effectiveness of Various Functional Monomers in Self-adhesive Resin Cements on Prosthetic Materials.,” J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 332–335, May 2022, doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_50_22.
A. M. Guéders, J. F. Charpentier, A. I. Albert, and S. O. Geerts, “Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining,” Oper Dent, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 450–455, 2006, doi: 10.2341/05-55.
F. Ozer and M. B. Blatz, “Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry.,” Compend Contin Educ Dent, vol. 34, no. 1, 2013.
C. Chen et al., “Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-Old wine in new bottles?,” J Dent, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 525–536, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
M. v. Cardoso et al., “Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry,” Aust Dent J, vol. 56, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 31–44, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01294.x.
M. Hanabusa et al., “Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine,” J Dent, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 475–484, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012.
S. E, S. A, P. G, T. G, R. U, and M. G, “Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type,” Ann Stomatol (Roma), vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.11138/ADS/2017.8.1.001.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.