Post-Soviet Georgia and Precedents of Hard Power

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/splogos.2025.04

Keywords:

Caucasus, Geopolitics, Ethno-politics, Conflict, Hard Power, Balance of Power

Abstract

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the emergence of new independent states in the post-Soviet space was accompanied by the intensification of ethno-political conflicts. In this space, the Caucasus is the most diverse region in terms of culture and ethno-confession. Three ethno-political conflicts have arisen here - the Armenian-Azerbaijani, Georgian-Abkhazian, and Georgian-Ossetian conflicts. The Caucasus is a place of interest for global and regional players, and these conflicts can be considered as a part of a large geopolitical game, and the parties to the conflict are pawns of these players. The competition between the great powers also determines the maneuvering of the ruling elites of the Caucasian countries. They set the elites of these countries against each other in the global game in order to pursue their interests. For centuries, Georgia, due to its geostrategic location, has been and continues to be an object of interest for Russia and other major powers. Therefore, it is important to analyze ethno-political conflicts and the 2008 war as a precedent for the manifestation of hard power concerning Georgia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

David Chochua, Georgian Technical University

PhD Candidate in Law and International Relations

References

ასმუსი, მცირე ომი რომელმაც მსოფლიო შეძრა. (თბილისი: ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა).2011

ოხანაშვილი ნ, „ეთნოპოლიტიკური კონფლიქტების გამომწვევი მიზეზების თეორიული ანალიზი (სამხრეთ კავკასიის შემთხვევა).“ სადისერტაციო ნაშრომი წარმოდგენილია სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა დოქტორის აკადემიური ხარისხის მოსაპოვებლად, ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი თბ.2018.

ხონელიძე.ზ., „მშვიდობის ქართული პარადიგმა“. რედაქტორი:ლადო ჭანტურია. ISBN. თბილისი (2021).

Allison, R. Russia resurgent? Moscow's campaign to 'coerce Georgia to peace'. International Affairs,(2008). 84(6), 1145-1171.

Bishku M., The South Caucasus Republics and Russia’s Growing Influence: Balancing On a Tightrope Gloria Center, Global Research in International Affairs, 2011.

Mearshaimer J.,The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Company(2001).

Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.(1948)

Ozkan B.,Who Gains from the “No War No Peace” Situation? A Critical Analysis of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Routledge.(2008).

Jervis, R. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, (1978) 30(2), 167-214.

Snyder G.,Mearsheimer’s World – Offensive Realizm and the Struggle for security. New York: Norton.(2001).

Waltz, K. N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.(1979).

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Chochua, D. (2025). Post-Soviet Georgia and Precedents of Hard Power. SOCIOPOLITOLOGOS, 1, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.52340/splogos.2025.04

Issue

Section

Articles