ECOLOGICAL DRIVERS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC EXPANSION OF LYME DISEASE (BORRELIOSIS) WORLDWIDE

How to Cite

Mebonia, N., Mchedlishvili, I., Zhizhilashvili, S., Jabidze, E., & Zhizhilashvili, A. (2025). ECOLOGICAL DRIVERS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC EXPANSION OF LYME DISEASE (BORRELIOSIS) WORLDWIDE. Collection of Scientific Works of Tbilisi State Medical University, 59, 68–70. Retrieved from https://journals.4science.ge/index.php/CSW/article/view/5072

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate ecological factors influencing the geographic distribution of Lyme disease (borreliosis). Methods. A systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review examined environmental, climatic, ecological, and land-use factors affecting the transmission dynamics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato through Ixodes tick vectors. Search terms included “Lyme disease,” “Lyme borreliosis,” “Borrelia burgdorferi,”Ixodes scapularis,” “Ixodes ricinus,” “climate change,” “range expansion,” and “habitat fragmentation.” Results. Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne infection in temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Its incidence and geographic range have expanded markedly in recent decades, driven by climate warming, altered precipitation, land-use transformation, biodiversity loss, and wildlife population changes. Rising temperatures have promoted the northward and altitudinal spread of tick vectors and increased human exposure. Conclusion. Ecological change and human activity substantially influence the global epidemiology of Lyme disease.

References

1. Barbour, A. G., & Fish, D. (1993). The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease. Science, 260(5114), 1610-1616. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8503006

2. Burn L, Fletcher MA, Montiel J, et al. Lyme Borreliosis and Tick Surveillance Epidemiology in the WHO Regions of the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific: A Systematic Literature Review (2005-2022) Beyond North America (Canada, United States of America), European Union Countries, and China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025 Nov;25(11):627-643. doi: 10.1177/15303667251364142. Epub 2025 Aug 11. PMID: 40785573.

3. Burn L, Vyse A, Pilz A, et al. Incidence of Lyme Borreliosis in Europe: A Systematic Review (2005-2020). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):172-194. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0070. PMID: 37071407; PMCID: PMC10122234.

4. Burn L, Pilz A, Vyse A, et al. Seroprevalence of Lyme Borreliosis in Europe: Results from a Systematic Literature Review (2005-2020). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):195-220. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0069. PMID: 37071401; PMCID: PMC10122246.

5. Dong Y, Zhou G, Cao W, et al. Global seroprevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in human populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(6):e007744. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007744. PMID: 35697507; PMCID: PMC9185477.

6. Estrada-Peña, A., Cutler, S., Potkonjak, A. et al. An updated meta-analysis of the distribution and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.in ticks in Europe.Int J Health Geogr .7, 41(2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0163-7

7. Gray, J. S., Dautel, H., Estrada-Peña, A., Kahl, O., & Lindgren, E. (2009). Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2009, 593232. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/593232

8. Ji Z, Jian M, Yue P, et al. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodidae Tick around Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens. 2022 Jan 24;11(2):143. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020143. PMID: 35215089; PMCID: PMC8879681.

9. Keesing, F., Belden, L. K., Daszak, P., Dobson, A., Harvell, C. D., Holt, R. D., … Ostfeld, R. S. (2010). Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature, 468(7324), 647-652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09575

10. Kilpatrick, H. J., Labonte, A. M., & Stafford, K. C. (2017). The relationship between deer density, tick abundance, and human cases of Lyme disease in a residential community. Journal of Medical Entomology, 54(3), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjw181

11. Lindgren, E., Tälleklint, L., & Polfeldt, T. (2000). Impact of climatic change on the northern latitude limit and population density of the disease-transmitting European tick. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(2), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108119

12. Ogden, N.H., Lindsay, L.R., Hanincová, K. et al. (2008). Role of migratory birds in introduction and range expansion of Ixodes scapularis ticks and of Borrelia burgdorferi. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(6), 1780-1790. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01982-07

13. Ogden, N.H., Radojeviæ, M., Wu, X., Duvvuri, V. R., Leighton, P. A., & Wu, J. (2014). Estimated effects of projected climate change on the basic reproductive number of the Lyme disease vector. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(6), 631-638. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307799

14. Ostfeld, R. S. (2011). Lyme disease: The ecology of a complex system. Oxford University Press.

15. Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000). Biodiversity and disease risk: The case of Lyme disease. Conservation Biology, 14(3), 722-728. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x

16. Sun Y, Zhang Y, Fang R, et al. Geographical Distribution and Prevalence of Borrelia Genospecies in Eurasian Ticks. Sci Data. 2025 Sep 2;12(1):1530. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05856-2. PMID: 40890147; PMCID: PMC12402306.

17. Steere AC, Strle F, Wormser GP, et al. Mead PS. Lyme borreliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Dec 15;2:16090. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.90. Erratum in: Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Aug 03;3:17062. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.62. PMID: 27976670; PMCID: PMC5539539.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.