REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES IN OLDER ADULTS
PDF

How to Cite

Subeliani, D., Chikvatia, L., Avazashvili, N., & Sakhvadze, S. (2023). REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES IN OLDER ADULTS . Collection of Scientific Works of Tbilisi State Medical University, 56, 140–142. Retrieved from https://journals.4science.ge/index.php/CSW/article/view/2299

Abstract

A proximal end fracture of the  humeral bone is one of the often common fractures and ranks third in terms of frequency (after a fracture of the hip and forearm) . Due to the fact that the shoulder joint is one of the complex joints in the human body, the incorrectly selected method of treating an intraarticular multi-fragmented  fracture of the shoulder joint leads to unsatisfactory consequences in the postoperative period and a high degree of disability.  As with other types of surgical interventions, osteosynthesis and arthroplasty of a multifractional fracture at the proximal end of the humeral bone are associated with a high degree of disability. The most common problem of them is the unsatisfactory function of the limb in the postoperative period, which leads to a deplorable consequence – a solid decrease in disability. Today there is no uniform rule that allows both the pros and cons of any treatment method to be determined during the operational period .The most effective methods in terms of results among the operational methods available today are osteosynthesis with a metal plate and screw, although today the trend in developed countries around the world is the tendency to arthroplasty of the upper end of the shoulder joint in the acute period of multifractional fracture, which ensures the activation of the disease in the early stages of surgery and the relieve of pain syndrome.

PDF

References

Aaron, D. Proximal humeral fractures: Internal fixation / D. Aaron, J. Shatsky, J. C. Paredes [et al.] // Instr. Course Lect. – 2013. – N 62. – P. 143–154.

Aguado, H. Minimally invasive polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis for 3– 4 part proximal humeral fractures: our institutional experience / H. Aguado, J. Mingo, M. Torres [etal.] (2016) // Injury. – 2016. – N 47 (suppl. 3). – P. S22–S28.3.

Ana Mata-Fink [et al. ] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults - 2013. PMID: 24246529, DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.021

Bachhal, V. Bilateral four-part anterior fracture dislocation of the shoulder – a case report and review of literature /V. Bachhal [et al.] // Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt. Dis. – 2012. – Vol.70.– P. 268–272.

Bell, J.-E. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures

in the elderly / J. E. Bell, B. C. Leung, K. F. Spratt [et al.] / // J.Bone Joint. Surg. Am. – 2011. – N 93 (2). – P. 121–131. – DOI:10.2106/JBJS.I.01505.

Bernstein, J. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification for proximal humerus fractures with computerized tomogrefic scans and plain radiographs / J. Bernstein, L. M.Adler, J. E Blank [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1996. – N78. – P. 1371–1375.

Boileau, P. Reverse shoulder fracture prothesis for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:early clinical and radiological results. Shoulder concept 2010:arthroscopy and arthroplasty / P. Boileau, G. Moineau, N.Brassart [et al.] // Sauramps. medical. – 2010. – P. 231–243.

Boons, H. W. Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial / H. W. Boons, J. H. Goosen, S. van Grinsven [etal.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2012 Dec. - N 470 (12). – P.3483–3491. – Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Court-Brown, C. M. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review / C. M. Court-Brown, B. Caesar // Injury. -2006. - N 37. – P. 691–697.

Court-Brown, C. M. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures / C. M. Court-Brown, A. Garg, M. M. Mc-Queen // Acta. Orthop. Scand. – 2001 Aug. – N 72(4). – P.365–371.

Duralde, X. A. The results of ORIF of displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate / X. A. Duralde, L. R. Leddy // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2010. – N 19 (4). – P. 480–488. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.008.

Fjalestad, T. Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial / T. Fjalestad, M. O. Hole, I. A., Hovden [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. 2012. – N

– P. 98–106. – DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821c2e15.

Gardner, M. J. Failure of fracture plate fixation / M. J. Gardner, J. M. Evans, R. P. Dunbar // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. – 2009. – N 17 (10). – P. 647–657

Gupta, A. K. Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients / A. K. Gupta, J. D. Harris, B. J. Erickson [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2015. – N 29 (1). – P. 54–59.

Hageman, M. G. The factors influencing the decision making of operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures

/ M. G. Hageman [et al.] // Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2015. – Vol.24. – P. 21–26.

Juan, Wang. Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly / Juan Wang,Yanbin Zhu, Fei Zhang [et al.] // International Orthopaedics. – March 2016. – Vol. 40, iss. 3. – P. 531–539.

Koval, K. J. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus / K. J.Koval, M. A. Gallagher, J. G. Marsicano [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1997 Feb. – N 79 (2). – P. 203–207.

Lind, T. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus / T. Lind, K. Krøner, J. Jensen // Arch. Orthop.Trauma Surg. – 1989. – N 108. – P. 285–287.

Maier, D. Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults / D. Maier, M. Jaeger, K. Izadpanah [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2014. – N 96. – P. 251–261.

Murray, I. R. Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes / I. R. Murray, A. K. Amin, T. O. White [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. – 2011. – N 93 (1). – P. 1–11. – DOI: 10.1302/0301- 620X.93B1.25702.

Neer, C. S Displaced proximal humerus fractures. Part1. Classification and evaluation / C. S. Neer // J. Bone Joint

Surg. (Am.). – 1970a. – N 52 (6). – P. 1077– 1089.

Olerud, P. Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4- part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial / P. Olerud, L. Ahrengart, S. Ponzer [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. - 2011 Oct. – N 20(7). – P. 1025–33. – Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Robinson, C. M. Modern perspectives of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures / C.M Robinson, A. K. Amin, K. C. Godley [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2011 Oct. – N 25 (10). – P. 618–629.

Rothberg, D. Fractures of the proximal humerus / D. Rothberg, T. Higgins // Orthop. Clin. North Am. – 2013 Jan. – N 44 (1). – P. 9–19.

Sidor, M. L. The Neer classification system for proximal humerus fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and reproducibility / M. L. Sidor, J. D. Zickerman, T.Lyon [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1993. – N 75. – P.

–1750.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.