OUR EXPERIENCE WITH DELAYED CESAREAN SCAR NEGATIVE OUTCOMES

OUR EXPERIENCE WITH DELAYED CESAREAN SCAR NEGATIVE OUTCOMES

Authors

  • NARGIS NAGIYEVA Baku Health Center
  • ISLAM MAGALOV Baku Branch Sechenov University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2023.05.38

Keywords:

Delayed cesarean scar, negative outcomes

Abstract

We consider PAS is rather a consequence of scar defect than real aggressively invasive placenta cases. This means that under certain circumstances and with certain cautiousness pregnancies can be prolonged to the III trimester and uterus conserving surgery is possible which improves both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Indeed, thorough evaluation of data and indications are needed in case of CSP. Decision to terminate or prolong the given pregnancy is so far based on many parameters including patients consent. Further differentiation and expert ultrasound report is required to distinguish between CSP and lower placentation near the scar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):265-273.

Braun T, van Beekhuizen HJ, Morlando M, Morel O, Stefanovic V “Developing a database for multicenter evaluation of Placenta Accreta Spectrum” Editorial Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2021; 100 Suppl. 1:7-11

Cali G, Forlani F, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Minneci G, D'Antonio F. Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):100-104.

Lin SY, Hsieh CJ, Tu YA, Li YP, Lee CN et al. New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020

Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, et al. European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta (EW-AIP). Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):271-5.

Cali G, Forlani F, Lees C, Timor-Tritsch I, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Prenatal ultrasound staging system for placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):752-760.

Einerson BD, Comstock J, Silver RM, et al. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: Uterine Dehiscence, Not Placental Invasion. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1104-1111.

Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J. Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):915-925.

Jordans IPM, Verberkt C, De Leeuw RA, et al. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):437-449.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-12

How to Cite

NAGIYEVA, N., & MAGALOV, I. (2023). OUR EXPERIENCE WITH DELAYED CESAREAN SCAR NEGATIVE OUTCOMES. Experimental and Clinical Medicine Georgia, (5). https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2023.05.38

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...