The Impact of Globalization on State Sovereignty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/splogos.2026.01.18

Keywords:

globalization, state, sovereignty, international relations, transformation

Abstract

This article examines the impact of globalization on the transformation of state sovereignty in the contemporary international system. The study critically reassesses the classical Westphalian understanding of sovereignty and demonstrates how its content is reshaped under conditions of economic integration, the strengthening of international institutions, the growing influence of transnational actors, and digital transformation. The research explores the main dimensions of sovereignty, internal and external, legal, political, economic, and technological, and highlights their interdependence. Particular attention is paid to the constraints on economic sovereignty arising from global financial markets and the policy conditionality imposed by international institutions, as well as to the increasing significance of technological and informational sovereignty in the twenty-first century. The article analyzes the European Union as a model of shared sovereignty, the role of the International Monetary Fund in limiting national economic policy autonomy, and China’s approach to strengthening digital sovereignty. The study concludes that contemporary states operate within a regime of hybrid sovereignty, where formal legal autonomy often diverges from the actual distribution of power. It argues that the viability of sovereignty in the age of globalization depends not on isolation, but on its adaptive, multidimensional, and integrative transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Teona Charkviani, Georgian Technical University

Doctor of International Relations

References

Agnew John, Globalization and Sovereignty. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Beetham David, (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Macmillan.

David Held, 1995, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Stanford University Press.

DeNardis Laura, The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.

Gereffi Gary, Global Value Chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World. London: Routledge, 2018.

Gross Leo, (1948). “The Peace of Westphalia.” American Journal of International Law, 42.

Grotius Hugo, (1625). On the Law of War and Peace. Oxford University Press.

Habermas, 1996, Between Facts and Norms, MIT Press.

Hoekman Bernard & Kostecki Michel, The Political Economy of the World Trading System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Jean Bodin, 1576, Six Books of the Commonwealth, Paris.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1762, Du Contrat Social, Amsterdam.

Keohane Robert O. & Nye Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 2000.

Krasner Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Krugman Paul, International Economics: Theory and Policy. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1991.

Mann Michael, (1986). The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge University Press.

Max Weber, 1919, Politics as a Vocation, Duncker & Humblot; Stephen Krasner, 1999, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press.

Miller Blake, Cybersecurity and Internet Governance in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Rodrik Dani, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.

Sassen Saskia, Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

Stiglitz Joseph, Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton, 2002.

Waltz Kenneth, (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.

Weiler J. H. H., The Constitution of Europe: "Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?" and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Charkviani, T. (2026). The Impact of Globalization on State Sovereignty. SOCIOPOLITOLOGOS, 1, 271–289. https://doi.org/10.52340/splogos.2026.01.18

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.