POLITICAL DISCOURSE AS A SUBJECT OF RESEARCH IN LINGUISTICS

POLITICAL DISCOURSE AS A SUBJECT OF RESEARCH IN LINGUISTICS

ავტორები

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2023.30.03

საკვანძო სიტყვები:

communication, political discourse, function, political language.

ანოტაცია

The article examines political discourse as an object of study in linguistics. In this regard, various definitions of political discourse and an analysis of its main functions are given, which leads to consideration of this concept from the perspective of a narrow and broad understanding. Within a narrow understanding of political discourse, it is assumed that speech activity is actualized exclusively by a politician in a political situation. When broadly understood, political discourse includes a wide range of subjects and objects associated with the political sphere. Within this interpretation, either a sender, an addressee, or a topic of communication is related to politics. In this case, we are talking not only about official political communication, but also about messages on political topics in the media, various Internet resources related to politics (blogs, websites, comments), these can also be scientific articles about politics, etc. This understanding of political discourse is associated with the processes of globalization and the increasing influence of various types of media on people. Attention is paid to the distinctive features of political discourse as a special type of communication, since the solution to political problems largely depends on how these problems are reflected in the language.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

წყაროები

Арутюнова Н.Д. Метафора и дискурс // Теория метафоры. – М.: Наука, 1990. – С. 5-33.

Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. – М.: Издательство «Советская энциклопедия», 1969.

Ван Дейк Т.А. Язык. Познание. Коммуникация. – М., 1989.

Водак Р. Язык. Дискурс. Политика. – Волгоград: Перемена, 1997.

Дейк Т.А., Кинч В. Стратегии понимания связного текста // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып.23. Когнитивные аспекты языка. – М.: Прогресс, 1988. – С. 25-41.

3игманн Ж.В. Структура современного политического дискурса: речевые жанры и речевые стратегии. Автореф. дис. ... канд. филол. наук. – М., 2003.

Карасик В.И. Языковой округ: личность, концепты, дискурс. – М.: Гнозис, 2004.

Чудинов А.П. Политическая лингвистика. – М.: Флинта, Наука, 2006.

Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса. – М.: Гнозис, 2004.

Шейгал Е.И. Театральность политического дискурса // Единицы языка в их функционировании. – Саратов, 2000. – С. 92-96.

Edelman M. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Epstein J. Radical Expression: Political Language, Ritual, and Symbol in England, 1790–1850. – Oxford: University Press, 1994.

Grey A. A breath of fresh air: tackling smoking through the media / A. Grey, L. Owen, K. Bolling. – Health Development Agency, 2000.

Inglehart R.F. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash / R. F. Inglehart, P. Norris. – Cambridge University Pr., 2016.

Lim E.T. The anti-intellectual presidency: The decline of presidential rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush / E. T. Lim. – Oxford University Press, 2008.

Safwat S. Speech Acts in Political Speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, USA July 2015, Volume 5, No. 7, pp. 699-706.

ჩამოტვირთვები

გამოქვეყნებული

2023-11-21

გამოცემა

სექცია

ენათმეცნიერება
Loading...