Affix of Destination in GESL

Affix of Destination in GESL

Authors

  • Tamar Makharoblidze Ilia state university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2022.798

Abstract

     It is generally quite difficult to distinguish affixes in sign languages, because formally an affix is ​​the same sign as a sign carrying lexical content. However, a lexical sign may become a morpheme in the parallel processes of its delexicization and erosion. Sign languages ​​are young languages ​​of high dynamics, thus, speed of the process of grammaticalization is much higher than in spoken languages. According to Makharoblidze (2019) to be considered as a morphological affix, a sign should meet the following criteria:

  1. A sign must be delexicalized and grammaticalized as well, which means that lexical meaning is faded;
  2. A sign must be erosive, which means having changes in dynamics or maybe two-handed sign becomes one-handed;
  3. A sign must have a fixed position, which means being fixed before another sign or after another sign;
  4. A sign should have a clear morphosemantic meaning - adding this sign should add specific semantic to the word.

      In Georgian sign language (GESL) the sign of destination with possessive-purpose semantics perfectly meets these criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2012. ქართული ჟესტური ენა. თბილისი.

მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2019. ქართული ჟესტური ენის ზმნის მორფოლოგია. თბილისი: ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა.

მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2015. ქართული ჟესტური ენის ლექსიკონი. თბილისი: ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა.

Brennan, Mary. 1990. Word-formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.

Brinton, J. Laurel and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization. 145-167 In: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2 of The New Psychology of Language. Ed. Michael Tomasello. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In: The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Eds. Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization. 17-44. In: Up and down the Cline 2 The Nature of Grammaticalization. Eds. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hopper, Paul. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticization. 149-187. In: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Vol. 1 of Approaches to Grammaticalization. Eds. Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hopper, Paul and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Janzen, Terry. 2012. Lexicalization and Grammaticalization. 816-841. In: Sign Language – An International Handbook. Eds. Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325

Meir, Irit. 2012. Word classes and word formation. 77-112. In: Sign Language – An International Handbook. Eds. Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325

Wilcox, Sherman. 2007. Routes from Gesture to Language. 107-131. In: Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies. Eds. Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea and Raffaele Simone. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-09

How to Cite

Tamar Makharoblidze. (2022). Affix of Destination in GESL. Language and Culture. https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2022.798
Loading...