Affix of Destination in GESL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2022.798Abstract
It is generally quite difficult to distinguish affixes in sign languages, because formally an affix is the same sign as a sign carrying lexical content. However, a lexical sign may become a morpheme in the parallel processes of its delexicization and erosion. Sign languages are young languages of high dynamics, thus, speed of the process of grammaticalization is much higher than in spoken languages. According to Makharoblidze (2019) to be considered as a morphological affix, a sign should meet the following criteria:
- A sign must be delexicalized and grammaticalized as well, which means that lexical meaning is faded;
- A sign must be erosive, which means having changes in dynamics or maybe two-handed sign becomes one-handed;
- A sign must have a fixed position, which means being fixed before another sign or after another sign;
- A sign should have a clear morphosemantic meaning - adding this sign should add specific semantic to the word.
In Georgian sign language (GESL) the sign of destination with possessive-purpose semantics perfectly meets these criteria.
Downloads
References
მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2012. ქართული ჟესტური ენა. თბილისი.
მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2019. ქართული ჟესტური ენის ზმნის მორფოლოგია. თბილისი: ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა.
მახარობლიძე, თამარ. 2015. ქართული ჟესტური ენის ლექსიკონი. თბილისი: ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა.
Brennan, Mary. 1990. Word-formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Brinton, J. Laurel and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization. 145-167 In: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2 of The New Psychology of Language. Ed. Michael Tomasello. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In: The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Eds. Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization. 17-44. In: Up and down the Cline 2 The Nature of Grammaticalization. Eds. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticization. 149-187. In: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Vol. 1 of Approaches to Grammaticalization. Eds. Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janzen, Terry. 2012. Lexicalization and Grammaticalization. 816-841. In: Sign Language – An International Handbook. Eds. Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325
Meir, Irit. 2012. Word classes and word formation. 77-112. In: Sign Language – An International Handbook. Eds. Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325
Wilcox, Sherman. 2007. Routes from Gesture to Language. 107-131. In: Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies. Eds. Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea and Raffaele Simone. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.