Argumentation as a discourse practice (Didactic and Linguistic concepts)

Argumentation as a discourse practice (Didactic and Linguistic concepts)

Authors

  • Gobiani Guranda
  • Gobiani Miranda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2021.626

Keywords:

Argumentation competence, discource practice, contextualization, interaction, concepts

Abstract

Argumentative competence, written or oral argumantation skills are essential in the process of academic non-academic communication. Raising this competence is of particular importance in the education process, which ultimately focuses on promoting the development of general, intercultural communication and stratehic learning skills.The competence to create an argumentative text is complex and includes different dimensions, which means the selection, construction, grouping of arguments, the proper conduct of argumentative reasoning. The systematization of the various concepts and respectives contained in it allows the arguments to be divided into two groups: speaker-oriented and interaction-oriented.Argumentative discussions and organized discussions processes generate discourse that is equated with the notion of community. Argumentation from the perspective of discourse analysis is a discource practice, which is realized in a specific context (contextualized), arises interactively, develops, models and is perceived by the participants in the interaction as argumentation. Strategic reasoning skills, as a discourse practice, instill in everyone in a particular society, in a particular discourse area, mandatory and important knowledge for all and form a solid system of thinking that ultimately leads to reasoned discussions processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

გარფიკელ, ჰარალდ - Garfinkel, Harold: Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall,1967

გოჩიტაშვილი გ, შაბაშვილი გ, შარაშენიზე ნ., - აკადემიური წერა (მეორე გამოცემა). გამომცემლობა ,,საიმედო “. თბილისი. 2013. 261 გვ.

ზიტე, ჰორსტ -Sitta, Horst: Sachtexte im Deutschunterricht? Wozu? Welche? Ein Plädoyer für stärkere Berücksichtigung argumentativer Texte im gymnasialen Deutschunterricht. In: Martin Fix / Roland Jost (Hg): Sachtexte im Deutschunterricht. Baltmannsweiler, Hohengehren 2005, S 150-159.

კელერი, რაინერ - Keller 2007: Keller, R. Diskursforschung. Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen. 3., aktual. Aufl. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

მარიონ მორეკ, ვივიენ ჰელერ, უტა ქვესტფოჰ - Mariam Morrek, vivien Heller, Uta Quasthoff: Erklären und argumentieren. Modellierung und empirische Befunde zu Struktur und Varianzen. In: Iris Meißner, Eva Lia Wyss (Hg): Bergunden – Erklären – argumentieren. Tübingen 2017

მროცეკ-ბეკერ, მიხაელ/ შნაიდე, ფრანკ/ტეტლინგ, კლაუზ - Becker-Mrotzek, Michael/ Schneider, Frank/ Tetling, Klaus: Argumentierendes Schreiben – lehren und lernen. Vorschläge für einen systematischen Kompetenzaufbau in den Stufen 5 bis 8. In: Fachliche Unterrichtsentwicklung Deutsch | Einführung. https://dev-schulentwicklung.qua-lis.de/cms/upload/netzwerk_NfUE/deutsch/argumentieren_einfuehrung_kurz.pdf (10.03.2021)

როშტაინ ბიოერნ - Rothstein, Björn: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten für Linguisten (Narr Studienbücher). Narr Verlag, Tübingen 2011

ტოულმინ, სტეფან -Toulmin, Stephen: Der Gebrauch von Argumenten. Weinheim. Beltz Athenäum 1996

ჰაუზენროფ, ჰეიკე/ უტო ქვეშტჰოფ - Hausendorf, Heiko/ Uta Quasthoff: Sprachentwicklung und Interaktion. Eine linguistische Studie zum Erwerb von Diskursfähigkeiten. Opladen: Westdeutsche Verlag 1996

წულაძე ლია, - აკადემიური წერა (ინტესიური სემინარი სოციალური მეცნიერებების მაგისტრანტებისთვის). გამომცემლობა ,,სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა ცენტრი“. თბილისი. 2006. 76 გვ.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-16

How to Cite

Gobiani Guranda, & Gobiani Miranda. (2021). Argumentation as a discourse practice (Didactic and Linguistic concepts) . Language and Culture, (25), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.52340/lac.2021.626

Issue

Section

LINGUISTIC
Loading...