The Fundamental Role of Binary Oppositions in Linguistic Theory

The Fundamental Role of Binary Oppositions in Linguistic Theory

Authors

Keywords:

binary oppositions, antonyms, contrastive elements, binary systems, semantics

Abstract

This article examines the concept of binary oppositions, the exploration of binary systems within linguistics, and the delineation of their role across various aspects of daily life and academic disciplines. The research investigates the conceptual domain of “binary oppositions” and explores their interconnections with significant fields, such as linguistics and semantics. In the semantic context, binary oppositions reveal three defining characteristics: polarity (indicating two closely related poles connected by a significant axis), clarity, and symmetry.The study is grounded in theories proposed by notable linguists, including Jakobson, Cruse, Lyons, Strauss, among others, to elucidate the principal ideas surrounding binary oppositions. To underscore the critical role of binary oppositions, the article further addresses linguistic signs and dichotomies, which enrich and deepen the complex and diverse creative expressions of various authors. These oppositional structures serve as a framework through which writers articulate the richness of language and bring their imagination to life.

Given the strong interrelation between binary opposition, language, perception, and comprehension, establishing the connection between an author’s expression and its reception is imperative. Thus, comprehending the nature of linguistic signs emerges as a foundational aim of semiotics. Binary oppositions stand apart from other relational structures by considering the presence of both contrasting components, with each element being evaluated in relation to the other. For instance, the concept of life cannot be discussed without the notion of death. Writers employ language as a vehicle for conveying creativity, aesthetic values, and specific thematic messages, while readers utilize interpretive codes to discern the core message, thus relying on language as a means of textual interpretation. Linguistic analysis consistently facilitates a clearer understanding of a text’s essential meaning.

Supported by numerous examples, it can be argued that the presence of oppositions contributes to the diversity of phenomena in the world. These phenomena includes not only everyday experiences and natural events but also the contrasts within the lexical structures of language.

Binary oppositions form an essential axis within the language system, facilitating organization across the morphological, semantic, and syntactic levels of language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

http://dictionary.css.ge/content/binary-oppositions

http://www.nplg.gov.ge/gwdict/index.php?a=term&d=5&t=10563

https://monoskop.org/Roman_Jakobson

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155871

Lyons, John (1977) Semantics. 1- Cambridge University Press

W.G. Widdowson (1996) Linguistics, Oxford University Press.

Bradford, R (1995), Roman Jakobson. London: Routledge

Jakobson,R (1956), Fundamentals of Language, Harvard University

Jakobson,R (1971), Selected Writings 2, Word and Language, Mouton, The Hague, Paris.

Steven C. Caton, (1987) Contributions of Roman Jakobson, Annual Review of Anthropology , Vol. 16 (1987), pp. 223-260

Murphy Lynne, M (2003), Semantic Realations and the Lexicon, Antonymy, Synonymy and other Paradigms; University of Sussex

Published

2024-11-20

How to Cite

Charelashvili, L. (2024). The Fundamental Role of Binary Oppositions in Linguistic Theory. Language and Culture, (32). Retrieved from https://journals.4science.ge/index.php/enadakultura/article/view/3182

Issue

Section

LINGUISTIC
Loading...