Functional Resilience and Surgical Risk: Revisiting Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Younger versus Elderly Myelopathic Patients.
PDF

Keywords

Degenerative cervical myelopathy
Cervical spinal cord
Spinal cord injury
Neurological function

How to Cite

Mozafari, P., Arora, G., Muzaffar, S., Upasena, S. H., & Ani, A. (2026). Functional Resilience and Surgical Risk: Revisiting Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Younger versus Elderly Myelopathic Patients. Junior Researchers, 4(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.02.17

Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is an aging related progressive disease characterized by chronic spinal cord compression secondary to degenerative changes in the spinal column. These changes include degenerative processes such as intervertebral disc degeneration, osteophytes, facet arthropathy, spinal stenosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The neurologic deficits associated with the above process are due to static and dynamic insults leading to ischemia, demyelination and ultimately neuronal loss. Since neurologic improvement following decompressive surgery is not always achieved, chronological age is no longer viewed as an important determinant for surgery. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are one of the surgical options which may be used in multilevel diseases. It may be associated with improvement in alignment and ventral decompression although complications are common. These include dysphagia, pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. This study aims to review literature in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases to find out whether outcomes are better in elderly (≥65 year) compared to younger (<65 year) patients undergoing multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Data regarding patients having spondylosis, ligament hypertrophy, OPLL, disc herniation and subluxation were gathered. Inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis consisted of excluding patients with infection, neoplasm, inflammatory spondyloarthropathies and lumbar stenosis. These data included mJOA score, Nurick grade, NDI, SF-36, sagittal alignment (C2-C7 Cobb, SVA), fusion rates and complications. All the studies have reported that there are clinically significant improvements among both age groups after surgery. High fusion rates with almost 94-96% rates reported by certain groups were noticed. Older patients have shown greater impairment in their baseline functionality, comorbid conditions, complications in early stages, longer stay in hospitals and being discharged to homes. Dysphagia was common among octogenarians. Frailty and pre-operative functional dependence were better predictors of complication, mortality, long stay and discharge as compared to age only. However, common frailty scores cannot completely represent resiliency of patients. Multilevel ACDF is an efficacious procedure in both younger and elderly patients; however, it is necessary to consider physiological reserves, frailty, dependence, disease severity and surgical complexity instead of age to help in determining risks and benefits.

https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.02.17
PDF

References

1. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy: introduction, rationale, and scope. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):21S-27S. doi:10.1177/2192568217703088.

2. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):70S-83S. doi:10.1177/2192568217701914.

3. Nakashima H, Tetreault LA, Nagoshi N, et al. Does age affect surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy? Results from the prospective multicenter AOSpine International study on 479 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(7):734-740. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-311074.

4. Tetreault L, Nouri A, Singh A, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a spectrum of pathology and disease. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2018.06.001.

5. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. doi:10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12812.

6. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology and surgical approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2013.09.006.

7. Song KJ, Choi BY. Current concepts of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a review of literature. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(4):531-539. doi:10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.531.

8. Buttermann GR. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273.

9. Arnautovic A, Mijares J, Begagić E, Ahmetspahić A, Pojskić M. Four-level ACDF surgical series 2000-2022: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes and complications. Br J Neurosurg. 2025;39(6):750-761. doi:10.1080/02688697.2024.2337020.

10. Luo CA, Lim AS, Lu ML, Chiu PY, Lai PL, Niu CC. The surgical outcome of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in myelopathic elderly and younger patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4495. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08243-8.

11. Chen J, Liu Z, Zhong G, et al. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients: a retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;132:47-51. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.02.012.

12. Lee CH, Son DW, Lee SH, Lee JS, Sung SK, Lee SW, Song GS. Radiological and clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in older patients: a comparative analysis of young-old patients (ages 65-74 years) and middle-old patients (over 75 years). Neurospine. 2020;17(1):156-163. doi:10.14245/ns.1836072.036.

13. Minhas SV, Mazmudar AS, Patel AA. Pre-operative functional status as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after elective cervical spine surgery. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(6):824-828.

14. Chung MS, Patel N, Abdelmalek G, Coban D, Changoor S, Elali F, et al. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) predicts adverse outcomes after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). N Am Spine Soc J. 2024;18:100318. doi:10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100318.

15. Wang P, Kong C, Teng Z, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients over 60 years old. Clin Interv Aging. 2023;18:1619-1627. doi:10.2147/CIA.S422418.

16. Buerba RA, Giles E, Webb ML, Fu MC, Gvozdyev B, Grauer JN. Increased risk of complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the elderly: an analysis of 6253 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(25):2062-2069.

17. Choi JHK, Birring PS, Lee J, Hashmi SZ, Bhatia NN, Lee YP. A comparison of short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy in the geriatric patient population: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2010-2020. Asian Spine J. 2024;18(2):190-199. doi:10.31616/asj.2023.0276.

18. Lambrechts MJ, Brush PL, Lee Y, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following anterior and posterior surgical approaches for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004586.

19. Lenga P, Gülec G, Kiening K, Unterberg AW, Ishak B. Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up. Brain Spine. 2023;3:102683. doi:10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683.

20. Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Shimer AL, Singla A, Shen F, Hassanzadeh H. Complications and mortality following one to two-level anterior cervical fusion for cervical spondylosis in patients above 80 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(9):E509-E514. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001876.

21. Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, Reeves BC, Freedman IG, David WB, Ehresman J, et al. Octogenarians are independently associated with extended LOS and non-routine discharge after elective ACDF for CSM. Global Spine J. 2022;12(8):1792-1803. doi:10.1177/2192568221989293.

22. An 11-year-long analysis of the risks associated with age in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in a large, urban academic hospital. Author list and full publication details should be confirmed before submission.

23. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489-495. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051.

24. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901-908. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028.

25. Chan JL, Hoh DJ. A commentary on “Frailty-muscle phenotypes predict outcomes after lumbar fusion in adults aged ≥75 years: a retrospective cohort study.” Neurospine. 2026;23(2):255-256. doi:10.14245/ns.26520620.0310.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.