The Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring on Spinal Cord Surgery Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review
PDF

Keywords

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM)
Neurophysiological technique
Spinal surgery
Multimodal approach
Neural pathway

How to Cite

Mozafari, P., Mazhar, K., Wadood, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2025). The Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring on Spinal Cord Surgery Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review. Junior Researchers, 3(5), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2025.03.05.13

Abstract

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is an important method used in spinal surgery, which is aimed at the maintenance of the functional integrity of the nervous system, in particular, the spinal cord and its neural structures. This is a narrative review that focuses on the effect of IONM on postoperative neurological outcomes. The search was conducted in electronic databases covering the studies published in the last five years (2015 to 2025) and included the following study types: clinical studies, observational studies, systematic reviews, and key case series; all studies were excluded based on the following criterion: animal study, non-spinal surgeries, and lack of outcome data. It has been shown that IONM is an important way of improving the safety of spinal surgery, especially in high-risk surgery like intramedullary or extramedullary tumor resections, cervical myelopathy, and corrections to spinal deformities. IONM can help prevent postoperative complications and enhance recovery by enabling surgical teams to act in time to prevent neurological compromise, which results in postoperative complications and death. Multimodal monitoring Multimodal monitoring, which includes somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs), motor evoked potential (MEPs), electromyography (EMG), and D-wave recording, provides a complete real-time evaluation of both sensory and motor pathways and has been shown to be particularly useful in complicated situations. IONM is based on the presence of qualified personnel and effective communication between surgeons and anesthesiologists and monitoring specialists during operations. Possible shortcomings are the absence of false negatives, inconsistency in sensitivity between different pathologies and the requirement of specific equipment and training. However, systematic reviews indicate that the routine use of IONM in the high-complexity spinal surgery procedures is cost-effective, decreases complications, reoperation, and the expenses of healthcare in the long run. The more advanced technologies, standardization of protocols and the wide availability of trained personnel are likely to increase IONM utility even more. IONM is a required precaution in spinal surgery today that allows anesthetists to identify and avert neural injury early in the course of surgery and enhances the patient’s safety and future neurological performance.

https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2025.03.05.13
PDF

References

Niljianskul N, Prasertchai P. The effect of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on neurological outcomes after spinal tumors operations: A single institution experience. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management. 2022; 31:101703. doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101703.

Schlaeppi JA, Schreen R, Seidel K, Pollo C. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal cord stimulation surgery: A systematic review. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2023;26(7):1024–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.06.010.

Stecker MM. A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery. Surgical Neurology International. 2011; 2:82. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.98579.

Ibrahim T, Mrowczynski O, Zalatimo O, Chinchilli V, Sheehan J, Harbaugh R, Rizk E. The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during spinal cord and spine surgery: A critical analysis of 121 cases. Cureus. 2017;9(11):e1861. doi:10.7759/cureus.1861.

Zanin L, Broglio L, Panciani PP, Bergomi R, De Rosa G, Ricciardi L, Guzzi G, Fiorindi A, Brembilla C, Restelli F, Costa F, Montemurro N, Fontanella MM. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in contemporary spinal surgery: A systematic review of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Brain Sciences. 2025;15(7):768. doi:10.3390/brainsci15070768.

Siller S, Sixta A, Tonn JC, Szelenyi A. Feasibility of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for extramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery in elderly patients. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2023; 165:1661–1670. doi:10.1007/s00701-023-05682-8.

Park T, Park J, Park YG, Lee J. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for spinal cord tumor surgery: Comparison of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials according to tumor types. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(4):610–620. doi:10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.610.

Basu S, Guduru AV, Hanasoge V, Joshi P, Sarangi T, Chakroborthy S. Correlation of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) signal changes with clinical outcomes in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy: A prospective study. Indian Spine J. 2025;8(1):19–25. doi: 10.4103/isj.isj_55_23.

Epstein NE, Agulnick MA. Perspective: Triple intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) should be considered the standard of care (SOC) for performing cervical surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Surg Neurol Int. 2023; 14:336. doi:10.25259/SNI_526_2023.

Arshad AR, Salman A, Naeem U, Qasmi SA. Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgical outcomes in patients with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2025 Apr;71(Suppl 1):249. doi:10.1227.

Thirumala PD, Muralidharan A, Loke YK, Habeych M, Crammond D, Balzer J. Value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to reduce neurological complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Mar;25:27-35. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.04.021.

Park JH, Hyun SJ. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(9):765–773. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v3.i9.765.

Laratta JL, Ha A, Shillingford JN, Makhni MC, Lombardi JM, Thuet E, Lehman RA, Lenke LG. Neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery: A multimodality approach. Global Spine J. 2018;8(1):68–77. doi:10.1177/2192568217706970.

Zurita Perea SN, Alvarez Abut PA, Seidel K. A concise guide to D-wave monitoring during intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(8):1242. doi:10.3390/medicina60081242.

Barzilai O, Lidar Z, Constantini S, Salame K, Bitan-Talmor Y, Korn A. Continuous mapping of the corticospinal tracts in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery using an electrified ultrasonic aspirator. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(2):161–168. doi:10.3171/2016.12. SPINE16985.

Green R, Mishra A, Schneider D, Najjar S, D’Amico RS, Sciubba DM, Lo SF, Silverstein JW. Subdural direct wave intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection: case report. Neurosurg Cases Rev. 2022;8(1):1–5. doi:10.1080/21646821.2022.2060011.

Oliva AM, Montejano J, Simmons CG, Vogel SA, Isaza CF, Clavijo CF. New frontiers in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(22):720. doi:10.21037/atm-23-1798.

Park MK, Lee SJ, Kim SB, Lee KW, Lee HJ, Han EY, et al. The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1211-8. doi:10.2147/CIA.S163467.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.