ALTERATIONS OF THE OSTEOINTEGRATION MARKERS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANTATION

ALTERATIONS OF THE OSTEOINTEGRATION MARKERS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANTATION

Authors

  • EMIR BAYANDUROV
  • ZURAB ORJONIKIDZE
  • THEA GABUNIA
  • TAMAR SANIKIDZE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2022.06.032

Keywords:

implantation, osteointegration, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase

Abstract

The stability of the implant depends significantly on the process of osseointegration between the bone and the implant. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of the osseointegration process have not yet been fully established and require further research in this direction.The aim of the study was to study the markers of the processes of osteointegration after dental implantation. The study was conducted on 31 patients who underwent implantation at the base of "Unident" and "A1" clinics.We collected gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) from patients before implantation and 1 month after implantation. In PISF and GCF fluids, bone markers (osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteocalcin (OC), osteopontin (OPN), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP)) were determined by the immunoenzymatic method.The PISF and GCF were collected using standardized paper strips (Periopaper, no.593525), which were placed at the entrance of the grooves of the implant and/or healthy teeth at a standardized depth of 1 mm for 30 seconds. The content of the OPG, OC and bALP in the PISF fluid 1 month after implantation does not change statistically significantly compared to the initial values in the GCF fluid (p=0.74; p=0.44; p=0.69). 1 month after the implantation, the content of OPN in PISF fluid increased by 133% compared to its content in GCF fluid before implantation (p<0.001).According to the study results, the OPN content in the PISF fluid increases sharply 1 month after the implantation. This parameter can be used as a marker of implant integration with living bone and bone wound healing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155–70.

Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo F, Delaney. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998; 93:165–76.

Martin TJ, Sims NA. Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption. Trends Mol Med. 2005; 11:76–81.

Matsuura T., Yamashita J. Dental Implants and Osseous Healing in the Oral Cavity, 2018, p. 940-956.

Ainamo J, Bay I. (1975) Problems and Proposals for Recording Gingivitis and Plaque. International Dental Journal, 25, 229-235.

Rudin HJ, Overdiek HF, Rateitschak KH. Correlation between sulcus fluid rate and clinical and histological inflammation of the marginal gingiva. Helv Odontol Acta. 1970; 14:21–26.

Sharma U, Pal D, Prasad R. Alkaline Phosphatase: An Overview, Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2013; 29: 269-278.

Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11:391–401.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-06

How to Cite

BAYANDUROV, E. ., ORJONIKIDZE, Z. ., GABUNIA, T. ., & SANIKIDZE , T. . (2022). ALTERATIONS OF THE OSTEOINTEGRATION MARKERS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANTATION. Experimental and Clinical Medicine Georgia, (6). https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2022.06.032

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...