TYPES OF WOUND DRESSING MATERIALS – A REVIEW

TYPES OF WOUND DRESSING MATERIALS – A REVIEW

Authors

  • KETEVAN EDIBERIDZE
  • ZURAB KAKABADZE
  • DAVID CHAKHUNASHVILI
  • IRAKLI AMIRANASHVILI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2022.06.030

Keywords:

Wound dressing, semi-permeable foam dressing, hydrogel, bioactive wound dressing

Abstract

Wound healing process is dynamic and complex, which depends on the synergic effect of a different cells, enzymes, cytokines and growth factors. Deregulation in the healing process can result in the development of non-healing chronic ulcer. Together with the technological advancement, over 3,000 types of wound healing produces have been developed for the treatment of various types of wounds. All currently existing wound treatment materials have their respective advantages and limitations and in order to achieve fast wound healing, it is necessary to select the appropriate method. In this article, we examine the effects of different types of wound dressing materials on the wound healing process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. Wound healing: biological features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Prob Surg 2001; 38: 77-89.

Szycher M and Lee SJ. Modern wound dressings: a systemic appproach to wound healing. J Biomater Appl 1992; 7: 142-213.

Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163: 257-68.

Rajendran S, Anand SC. Hi-tech textiles for interactive wound therapies: Handbook of Med Textiles; 2011

Lazurus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Margolis DJ, Pecoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 489-93.

Bischoff M, Kinzl L, Schmelz A. The complicated wound. Unfallchirurg 1999; 102: 797-804.

Tarnuzzer RW, Schultz GS. Biochemical analysis of acute and chronic wound environments. Wound Repair Regen 1996; 4: 321-5.

Clark RAF. Wound repair Overview and general considerations. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair 2nd edition. Plenum: New York; 1996; 3-5.

Dowsett C, Newton H. Wound bed preparation: TIME in practice. WOUNDS UK 2005; 1: 58-70.

Vanwijck R. Surgical biology of wound healing. Bulletin et mem oires de l’Academie royale de medecine de Belgique 2000; 156: 175-84.

Degreef HJ. How to heal a wound fast. Dermatol Clin 1998; 16: 365-75.

Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. Physiology of wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000; 13: 6-11.

Rivera AE, Spencer JM. Clinical aspects of full-thickness wound healing. Clin Derm. 2007; 25: 39-48.

Strecker-McGraw MK, Jones TR, Baer DG. Soft tissue wounds and principles of healing. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2007; 25: 1-22.

Baxter E. Complete crime scene investigation handbook: CRC press. 2015; p 313.

Finn G, Kirsner R, Meaume S, Munter C, Sibbald G. Clinical wound assessment a pocket guide, Coloplast 2006; p 6.

Baranoski S, Ayello EA. Wound dressing: an evolving art and science. Adv Skin Wound Care: the J Preven Healing 2012; 25: 87-92.

Fernandes NF, Schwartz RA. A hyperextensive review of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Pubfacts 2008; 82: 242-8.

Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM. Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. Indian J Pharml Sci 2008; 97: 2892-923.

Debra JB, Cheri O. Wound healing: Technological innovations and market overview. 1998; 2: 1-185.

Thomas S, Loveless P. Comparative review of the properties of six semipermeable film dressings. Pharm J 1988; 240: 785-7.

Thomson T. Foam Composite. US Patent 7048966. 2006.

Marcia RES, Castro MCR. New dressings, including tissue engineered living skin. Clin Dermatol 2002; 20: 715-23.

Thomas S. Hydrocolloids. J Wound Care 1992; 1: 27-30.

Barlett RH. Skin substitutes. J Trauma 1981; 21: S731.

Ramshaw JAM, Werkmeister JA, Glatteur V. Collagen based bioma terials. Biotech Rev 1995; 13: 336-82.

Doillon CJ, Silver FH. Collagen-based wound dressing: Effect of hyaluronic acid and fibronectin on wound healing. Biomaterials 1986; 7: 3-8.

Ishihara M, Nakanishi K, Ono K, Sato M, Kikuchi M, Saito Y, et al. Photo crosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 833-40.

Supp DM, Boyce ST. Engineered skin substitutes: Practices and potentials. Clin Derm 2005; 23:403-12.

Ueno H, Mori T, Fujinaga T. Topical formulations and wound heal ng applications of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 52: 105-15.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-06

How to Cite

EDIBERIDZE, K. ., KAKABADZE, Z. ., CHAKHUNASHVILI, D. ., & AMIRANASHVILI , I. . (2022). TYPES OF WOUND DRESSING MATERIALS – A REVIEW . Experimental and Clinical Medicine Georgia, (6). https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2022.06.030

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...