The Impact of Job Satisfaction and Motivating Factors on Company Loyalty and Long-term Motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/tuw.2025.38.01.25Keywords:
job satisfaction, motivating factors, company loyalty, long-term motivationAbstract
This study is based on three independent logistic regression models, which are used to examine in detail three main dimensions of employee satisfaction in Georgia: (1) satisfaction with education, (2) satisfaction with management, and (3) loyalty to the company.Our research analysis allows us to clearly distinguish between the factors that influence the long-term decision to stay with a company, as well as identify what types of incentives have a significant impact on employees' work behaviors and organizational expectations.
The results of the study show that satisfaction with management is the strongest factor in all three models (p < 0.004), indicating that the presence of positive relationships with management significantly determines employees' work attitudes. In addition, material factors—including compensation, financial incentives, and work environment—have a statistically insignificant effect on loyalty, indicating that long-term loyalty is not formed solely on the basis of hygienic conditions.
The study reveals an important conclusion: long-term employee loyalty is much more closely related to the safety of the working environment, length of service, age characteristics, and the degree of trust in management. Accordingly, the hypothesis to which the analysis was conducted is formulated as follows:
H—Hygiene factors (compensation, incentives, work environment, collegial relationships, and social guarantees) create the necessary basis for employee satisfaction, although their impact on long-term organizational loyalty and the likelihood of remaining in the company is sharply limited.
Downloads
References
Peikrishvili, L. (2025). The impact of digital-technological progress on the work attitude of the Gen Z generation (ციფრულ-ტექნოლოგიური პროგრესის გავლენა Gen Z თაობის შრომით განწყობაზე) Quarterly refereed and peer-reviewed international scientific journal "Science and Innovation," 2025/4. გვ. 287 https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://issmsai.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/2025.-n-4-1-1.docx
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. Wiley
Vroom, VH. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley
Edwin Locke & Gary Latham. A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance, 1990, Prentice Hall
Porter, LW, & Lawler, EE (1968). Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Irwin.
Adams, JS (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
Meyer, JP, & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
Allen, DG, & Bryant, PC (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2010.51827775
John P. Meyer & Natalie J. Allen (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

