Amorphous Polarity


International System

How to Cite

Tsintsadze, I. . (2022). Amorphous Polarity . GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS, 4(4), 374–398.


 After the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, evaluation of the new international system became quite important subject in the field of international relations. The group of specific authors recognized the system as the Unipolar one. However, there were others, who regarded the moment as unipolar, not the system. Several years later, the new evaluation was born, referring to the US as declining power and hinting that the system was in transition. Conversely, still there were scientists who emphasized that the United States was the unchallengeable sole superpower on the world political map. Meanwhile, certain authors suggested that the system became bipolar because of China’s irreversible economic progress. Thus, the bipolarists claim that there are only two great powers in the contemporary international system. Against the all above-mentioned evaluations, there is another assumption that the current world is multipolar, with more than two great powers. However, the present-day multipolarity is quite different than 19th century original analogy. The simple verdict that can be derived from different evaluations of international system is that the conclusions of contemporary authors make understanding of modern system quite vague. Thus, it is important to ask what the ongoing international model is. The aim of the article was to find out the type of system not via supporting an author’s verdict but to discover links and common ground among different conclusions. The goal didn’t prevail however, the result made by specific evaluation turned out to be anomalous.


Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Art, R. J., & Waltz, K. N. (1983). Technology, Strategy, and the Uses of Force. In R. J. Art, & K. N. Waltz, The Use of Force (p. 28). Lanham: Md.: University Press of America.

Beckley, M. (2018). Unrivaled. London: Cornell University Press.

Buzan, B. (2004). The United States and the great powers : world politics in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dempsey, J. (2012, November 12). With the rise of China, and the election of a new communist party leadership that will oversee China’s development over the next decade, the world is drifting back toward a bipolar constellation. Retrieved from

Deutsch, K. W., & Singer, J. D. (1964). Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability. World Politics, 390-406.

Gruner, W. D. (1992). Was There a Reformed Balance of Power System or Cooperative Great Power Hegemony? The American Historical Review, 725-732.

Healy, B., & Stein, A. (1973). The Balance of Power in International History: Theory and Reality. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33-61.

Huntington, S. P. (1999). The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, 35-49.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs, 23-37.

Jenkins, R. (2019). How China is Reshaping the Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kaplan, M. A. (1957). Balance of Power, Bipolarity and Other Models of International Systems. The American Political Science Review, 684-695.

Keersmaeker, G. D. (2017). Polarity, Balance of Power and Internatinal Relations Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Keohane, R. O. (1969). Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics [Review of Alliances and the Third World.; Alliances and American Foreign Policy.; Alliances and Small Powers.; The Inequality of States., by G. Liska, R. E. Osgood, R. L. Rothstein, & D. Vita. International Organization, 291–310.

Kraehe, E. E. (1992). A Bipolar Balance of Power. he American Historical Review, 707–715.

Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, 5-51.

Layne, C. (2012). This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the "Pax Americana". International Studies Quarterly, 203-213.

Litera, B. (1994/95). The Kozyrev Doctrine - a Russian Variation on the Monroe Doctrine. Perspectives, 45-52.

Mansfield, E. D. (1993). Concentration, Polarity, and the Distribution of Power. International Studies Quarterly, 105-128.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics . New York: W.W Norton & Company.

Mueller, J. (1988). The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World. International Security, 55–79. doi:

Nogee, J. L., & Spanier, J. W. (1977). The Politics of Tripolarity. World Affairs, 319-333.

Nye, J. S. (2015). The Future of Russian-American Relations. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 34-43.

O'Rourke, R. (2020). Renewed Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Pillsbury, M. (2015). The Hundread Year Marathon. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Putin, V. (2007, February 10). Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia. Retrieved from

Rich, N. (1992). Great Power Diplomacy 1814-1914. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rich, N. (2003). Great Powers Diplomacy scince 1914. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schell, J. (1982). The Fate of the Earth. New York: Knopf.

Schroeder, P. W. (1992). Did the Vienna Settlement Rest on a Balance of Power? The American Historical Review, 683-706.

Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965. In B. Russett, Peace, War, and Numbers (pp. 19-48). Beverly Hills: Sage.

SIPRI. (2021). Retrieved from SIPRI web site:

Stavljanin, D. (2020, May 18). World Should Take 'Declining Power' Russia 'More Seriously,' Says Political Analyst Nye. Retrieved from

Thompson, W. R. (1986). Polarity, the Long Cycle, and Global Power Warfare. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 587-615.

Tunsjø, Ø. (2018 ). The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Walt, S. M. (2011). The End of the American Era. The National Interest, 6-16.

Waltz, K. N. (1964). The Stability of a Bipolar World. Daedalus, 881-909.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of Internationa Politics. London: Addison-Wesley.

Waltz, K. N. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 44-79.

Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 5-41.

Wayman, F. W. (1984). Bipolarity and War: The Role of Capability Concentration and Alliance Patterns among Major Powers, 1816-1965. Journal of Peace Research, 61-78.

Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, 5-41.

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from World Bank: Population, total - Norway:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from World Bank: GDP (current US$) - Norway:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from World Bank: GDP (current US$) - Bangladesh:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from World Bank GDP per capita (current US$) - United States:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from GDP per capita (current US$) - Luxembourg:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from Population, total - United States:

World Bank. (2020). World Bank web site. Retrieved from Population, total - Luxembourg: Population, total - Luxembourg

World Bank. (2020). World Bank: Population, total - Bangladesh. Retrieved from World Bank we site:

Xuetong, Y. (2011, December 30). From a Unipolar to a Bipolar Superpower System: The Future of the Global Power Dynamic. Retrieved from

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...