Differences in Socio-economic Transformations of Rural Communities in Russian Multi-ethnic Regions

Differences in Socio-economic Transformations of Rural Communities in Russian Multi-ethnic Regions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/ggj.2024.04.02.07

Keywords:

ethnic groups, migration, social modernization, local rural-urban systems, socio-economic transformation, rural areas

Abstract

The article analyzes the differences in the rural communities’ transformation in some national republics of Russia. To verify the hypothesis put forward on the basis of a review of sources and field observations, demographic statistics, rural settlement and other indicators characterizing the rural population are analyzed. Among rural communities with different ethnic identities, there is a significant differentiation in the share of the rural population, birth rate and settlement structure. Differentiation is due to the different involvement of ethnic rural communities in urbanization processes and processes of social modernization. Analysis and classification of differences made it possible to identify options (inertial and modernization) and stages ("expansion", "from expansion to compression", "compression" and "disappearance in the previous format") of the post-Soviet rural communities transformation. Most of the Russian rural communities are undergoing active modernization. At the same time, in rural areas of Russia, there are still rural communities at the stage of "expansion" (largely Dagestani and Ingush rural communities). The discussion section presents a classification of ethnic rural communities in Russia according to their predominant variant and stage of transformation in the post-Soviet period. Based on the results of field studies, examples are given that confirm the presence of deviations from the predominant variant and stage of transformation of rural communities. For example, the leading factor in the differences in the variants and stages of socio-economic transformation of the surveyed Tatar and Chuvash rural communities of the Batyrevsky and Fyodorovsky districts is the development of the economic base of the region. Due to the more active Soviet industrialization of the economy of Bashkortostan, many communities in the Fyodorovsky district are at the stage of "compression" and "disappearance", while in the Batyrevsky district only in recent decades has the outflow of population to the cities accelerated. In addition, a comparative analysis of the rural settlement transformation of ethnic groups made it possible to confirm the universality of the stages of rural communities’ transformation. In the Batyrevsky district this is expressed, for example, in the temporary lag of depopulation of Tatar and Chuvash rural communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Linar Imangulov, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia

References

Alekseev A.I., Imangulov L.R. (2022). Rural areas of Bashkiria: Prevailing types and features of transformation in the post-Soviet period. Peasant Studies, 4. doi: 10.22394/2500-1809-2022-7-4-109-132

Alekseev A.I., Safronov S.G. (2017). Typology of rural settlements in the European part of Russia under recent demographic and socio-economic situation. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, 6.

Averkieva K.V. (2021). Lateral Rural Migrations and Local Transformation Processes of Rural Areas in the Forest Zone of the Old-Developed Non-Black Earth Region. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 85(6). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621060066

Averkieva K.V., Nefedova T.G., Kondakova T. Yu. (2021). Polarization of socio-economic space in the regions of the old-developed Center of Russia: the example of the Yaroslavl region. World of Russia, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-1-49-66

Breslavsky A.S. (2013). Suburbanization in post-Soviet Buryatia and features of internal migration flows. Oikumena. Regional studies, 3.

Cherkasov A.A. (2018). Features of the involvement of ethnic groups in urbanization processes in Russia. Science, innovation, technology, 4.

Collins-Kreiner, N. (2013). The Life Cycle Concept & the Evolution of Villages. Journal of Applied Economics and Business, 1.

Demographic modernization of Russia, 1900-2000 (2006). Ed. A. Vishnevsky. New publishing house.

Fadeeva O. P. (2015). Rural communities and economic structures: from survival to development. IEOP SB RAS.

Fomkina A.A. (2017). Transformation of rural settlement systems in the old-developed non-black earth region from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 21st century. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, 5.

Gusakov T.Yu. (2019). The multistructure of the contemporary ethnic region in Russia: Archaization, agrarianization and migration (on the example of the Republic of Tyva). Peasant Studies, 4.

Hualou Long, Jian Zou, Yansui Liu, (2009). Differentiation of rural development driven by industrialization and urbanization in eastern coastal China. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.03.003.

Imangulov L.R. (2021). Typology of settlements in a polyethnic region (on the example of Chuvashia). Russian peasant studies, 4. doi: 10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-4-107-124

Imangulov L.R. (2023). Ethnic aspects of rural migration in the Fedorovsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, 2. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.2.11

Imangulov L.R., Maksimenko M.R., Savoskul M.S., Safronov S.G. (2021). Study of the ethnocultural factor on the evolution of rural settlement using the example of multiethnic regions of Bashkiria and Mari El. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, 1.

Nefedova T G. (2012). Rural Stavropol through the Eyes of a Moscow Geographer. Diversity of Regions in the South of Russia. Publishing House of Saratov State University.

Nefedova T.G. (2012). Ten topical issues about Rural Russia: A geographer’s viewpoint. URSS.

Yajing Li, Jianhua He, Qiaobing Yue, Xuesong Kong, Miaomiao Zhang (2022). Linking rural settlements optimization with village development stages: A life cycle perspective. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102696.

Yuheng Li, Hans Westlund, Yansui Liu (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003.

Zubarevich N.V. (2003). Social development of Russian regions in the transition period. PhD dissertataion.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

Imangulov, L. (2024). Differences in Socio-economic Transformations of Rural Communities in Russian Multi-ethnic Regions . Georgian Geographical Journal, 4(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.52340/ggj.2024.04.02.07

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...