Intellectual Property's Role in Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/spectri.2023.08.02.22საკვანძო სიტყვები:
Intellectual Property, Innovation, Economic Growth, Technology Transfer, Sustainable Development, IP Lawsანოტაცია
Intellectual Property (IP) represents a critical aspect of modern economies, serving as a catalyst for innovation, economic growth, and cultural development. However, the relationship between IP and development is complex and multifaceted.
This paper examines the dynamics of intellectual property in the context of economic and societal development. It explores the advantages and challenges of IP protection, focusing on how developing countries can harness IP to foster innovation and progress while balancing concerns related to access, equity, and social well-being.
Intellectual Property (IP) comprises a range of legal rights that grant protection to creative and innovative works. These rights encompass patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, among others. The primary purpose of IP is to encourage innovation and creativity by providing creators with exclusive rights to their inventions, artistic works, and other forms of intellectual creation. However, the relationship between IP and development is a subject of ongoing debate. This paper delves into the various dimensions of this complex relationship.
The article is structured into 2 chapters, encompassing an introduction and a conclusion.
The first chapter discusses how IP laws can be framed to encourage development. Development is a broad concept to define, but important to understand because it is among the key objectives of the global and many domestic intellectual property systems. Development used to be the same as modernization and economic growth. Indeed many experts in the past considered these two features to be both a primary aim and an indicator of international development. A well-balanced system of granting and exploiting intellectual property rights is a factor in economic growth as it encourages investment and trade, but if designed and used appropriately, it can also help cultural creativity to thrive, educate a population or workforce, drive technological innovation to improve health and nutrition and yield other social benefits as well. Intellectual property by itself neither helps nor hinders development necessarily. It is how laws, policies, and practices are designed and used in different countries that determine whether IP is effective for development purposes.
The second chapter thoroughly presents the WIPO's contribution to global development. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) plays a pivotal role in development by promoting the responsible and equitable use of intellectual property. WIPO offers a platform for international cooperation, facilitating the sharing of knowledge and technology across borders. It provides capacity-building programs to empower developing nations to navigate IP systems effectively. Additionally, WIPO supports policies and initiatives that strike a balance between IP protection and development, particularly in areas like access to medicines and technology transfer. WIPO's contributions foster innovation, encourage economic growth and ensure that the benefits of intellectual property are accessible to all, thus driving sustainable development on a global scale. The WIPO Development Agenda (DA) is a framework established by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to integrate development considerations into its work and promote a more balanced approach to intellectual property (IP) in the context of global development.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
წყაროები
Abbott, F. M., & Correa, C. M. (2007). The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 10(4).
Aoki, R. (2007). Patent Pools, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Licensing Market. The University of Chicago Law Review, 74(2).
Access to Research for Development and Innovation (ARDI) 2017 https://tind.wipo.int/record/28612https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/docs/indigenous_fellowship.pdf
Boyle, J. (2003). The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(33).
Cockrill, A., & Fink, C. (2018). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Economic Research Working Paper No. 39.
Chirwa, D. F., & Nyasulu, P. (2007). Antiretroviral Drugs: The Role of Compulsory Licenses. University of Malawi Law Journal, 1(2).
Implementation of paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/implem_para6_e.htm
Fink, C., & Reichenmiller, P. (2020). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Economic Research Working Paper No. 40.
Kapczynski, A., & Krikorian, G. (2005). Access to Knowledge: New Information Technologies and the Emergence of Intellectual Property Regimes. American University International Law Review, 21(2).
Sharafudeen M. (2019) WIPO Re:Search: Advancing science for neglected tropical diseases, malaria and tuberculosis. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4423&plang=EN
Landes, W. M., Posner, R. A. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press.
May, C., Sell, S. K., & Williams, D. (2015). Intellectual Property and Global Health: From Corporate Social Responsibility to the Access to Knowledge Movement. Transforming Global Governance with Middle Power Diplomacy.
Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics
Maskus, K. E. (2015). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development. World Development, 33(7),
Maskus, K. E. (2013). International Patent Rights: A Modern Dilemma. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1)
Niesporek A. Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Products & Access to Essential Medicines in Developing Countries. Ekonomiska institutionen; 2005.
Roffe, P. (2013). The New Development Agenda: Trade, Intellectual Property, and Sustainable Development. Third World Network
Shavell, S. (2018). Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property: Justifications and Problems of Exclusive Rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1)
WIPO Development Agenda. (2007). Retrieved from World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/ip-development/en/agenda/
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2021). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. WIPO Publication No. 489 (E).
ჩამოტვირთვები
გამოქვეყნებული
როგორ უნდა ციტირება
გამოცემა
სექცია
ლიცენზია
ეს ნამუშევარი ლიცენზირებულია Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 საერთაშორისო ლიცენზიით .