Evaluation of Dermatology life quality index- DLQI and Coping Strategy According to Gender in rosacea patients

Evaluation of Dermatology life quality index- DLQI and Coping Strategy According to Gender in rosacea patients

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/spectri.2023.08.02.04

Keywords:

Rosacea, DLQI, Coping strategy

Abstract

Rosacea can be classified as a socially significant social disease. It reduces the quality of life and causes depressive disorders. Nosogenic characteristics are determined by many psychological, personal, social and biological factors - including objective characteristics of the disease, such as the severity of symptoms and sensations caused by the disease, which cause maladaptation of these patients and reduce the response to standard therapy.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the dermatological quality of life index - DLQI and coping strategy by gender in rosacea patients

Among the patients examined by us - 18.12% were men, and 81.88% were women (p<0.0001);

The average age of onset of the disease in women and men does not differ significantly (p=0.2959), while the phymatous subtype was detected only in men.

Papulopustular subtype predominated in patients of both sexes. However, the frequency of this subtype was higher in women (p=0.0705), and of the eye in men (p=0.6286). The phymatous subtype was observed only in men, the frequency of the erythematogenic subtype did not differ significantly by gender.

According to our data, the HRQoL score is higher in women than in men (p=0.0067).

Activities of daily living, problem focus, expression of emotions, and use of emotional social support were significantly higher in women than in men, while positive reinterpretation and growth were lower.

In women, symptoms and feelings are reliably negatively correlated with mental detachment and acceptance; This shows a reliable negative correlation with treatment-related problems with mental detachment and acceptance; There is also a negative correlation between acceptance and work and/or school and personal relationships.

In male patients, positive reinterpretation and growth were associated with treatment, while use of instrumental social support was significantly negatively associated with work and/or school. Activities of daily living, focus and expression of emotion, and use of emotional social support were significantly higher in women than in men, while positive Reinterpretation and growth were low.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sopiko Azrumelashvili, Tbilisi State University

MD. PhD student

Tina Kituashvili, Tbilisi State University

Associate Professor

References

Plewig, Gerd, Bodo Melnik, and WenChieh Chen. "Rosacea Clinic and Classification." Plewig and Kligman´ s Acne and Rosacea. Springer, Cham, 2019. 517-557.

Korting HC, Schöllmann C. Current topical and systemic approaches to treatment of rosacea. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2009 Aug;23(8):876-82.

Sarkar R, Podder I, Jagadeesan S. Rosacea in skin of color: A comprehensive review Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020; Nov-Dec; 86 (6):611-621.

Webster GF. Rosacea. Med Clin North Am 2009; 93(6): 1183–1194

Rainer BM, Kang S, Chien AL. Rosacea: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Dermatoendocrinol. 2017; 9(1):e1361574. Published 2017 Oct 4.

Diaz, C., O'callaghan, C., Khan, A., & Ilchyshyn, A. (2003). Rosacea: a cutaneous marker of Helicobacter pylori infection? Results of a pilot study. Acta dermato-venereologica, 83(4).

Spoendlin, J., Voegel, J.J., Jick, S.S., and Meier, C.R. A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the U.K.: rosacea in the U.K. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 167: 598–605

Zeichner JA, Eichenfield LF, Feldman SR, Kasteler JS, Ferrusi IL. Quality of Life in Individuals with Erythematotelangiectatic and Papulopustular Rosacea: Findings From a Web-based Survey. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018; 11(2):47–52.

Yoo JJ1, Thaller SR. Treatment of Rhinophyma with Surgical Excision and Amniotic Membrane. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul; 30(5):1563-1564.

Wladis EJ1, Adam AP2. Treatment of ocular rosacea. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 May - Jun; 63(3):340-346.

Oussedik E, Bourcier M,Tan J,Psychosocial Burden and Other Impacts of Rosacea on Patients’ Quality of Life,Dermatologic Clinics,Volume 36, Issue 2,2018,Pages 103-113.

Shim, Tang Ngee, and Anthony Abdullah. “The effect of pulsed dye laser on the dermatology life quality index in erythematotelangiectatic rosacea patients: an assessment.” The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology vol. 6, 4 (2013): 30-2.

Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al. Standard classification of rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 584-7.

Aksoy B, Altaykan-Hapa A, Egemen D, et al. The impact of rosacea on quality of life: effects of demographic and clinical characteristics and various treatment modalities. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163: 719–25.

Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, et al. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: what do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J Invest Dermatol. 2005; 125: 659-64.

Tan, J., & Berg, M. (2013). Rosacea: current state of epidemiology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 69(6), 27-35.

Spoendlin, J. A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the U. K. / J. Spoendlin, J. J. Voegel, S. S. Jick et al. // Br. J. Dermatol. – 2012. - № 167. – P. 598—605.

Abram K., Silm H., Oona M. Prevalence of rosacea in an Estonian working population using a standard classification. Acta Derm Venereol 2010; 90 (3): 269—27

Kyriakis K. P., Palamaras I., Terzoudi S. et al. Epidemiologic aspects of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53 (5): 918—919. 23.

Samodelkina K.A., Korotkiy N.G., T.V. M. Sovremennye kontseptsii etiologii i patogeneza rozatsea. Klin dermatol venerol 2012; (2): 4-8. [Самоделкина К.А., Короткий Н.Г., Т.В. М. Современные концепции этиологии и патогенеза розацеа. Клин дерматол венерол 2012; 2: 4—8]. 24. Reinholz M.

Reinholz M., Tietze J. K., Kilian K. et al. Rosacea — S1 guideline. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013: 11 (8): 768—780.

Kyriakis K. P., Palamaras I., Terzoudi S. et al. Epidemiologic aspects of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53 (5): 918—919.

Van Der Linden, Mireille, et al. "Health-related quality of life in patients with cutaneous rosacea: a systematic review." Acta dermato-venereologica 95.4 2015: 395-400.

Van Der Linden, Mireille, et al. "Health-related quality of life in patients with cutaneous rosacea: a systematic review." Acta dermato-venereologica 95.4 2015: 395-400.

Böhm D1, Schwanitz P, Stock Gissendanner S, Schmid-Ott G, Schulz W. Symptom severity and psychological sequelae in rosacea: results of a survey.Psychol Health Med. 2014; 19(5):586-91..

Böhm D, Schwanitz P, Stock GS, Schmid-Ott G, Schulz W. Symptom severity and psychological sequelae in rosacea: results of a survey. Psychol Health Med 2014; 19: 586–591

Tannus FC, Picosse FR, Soares JM, Bagatin E. Rosacea-specific quality of life questionnaire: translation, cultural adaptation and validation for Brazilian Portuguese. An Bras Dermatol. 2018; 93(6):836–842.

Sowińska-Gługiewicz, I., & Kaliszewska, K. (2013). Ways and Strategies for Coping with Stress and Rosacea. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(2), 39-54.

Meléndez, J. C., Mayordomo, T., Sancho, P., & Tomás, J. M. (2012). Coping strategies: gender differences and development throughout life span. The Spanish journal of psychology, 15(3), 1089-1098.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Azrumelashvili, S., & Kituashvili, T. (2024). Evaluation of Dermatology life quality index- DLQI and Coping Strategy According to Gender in rosacea patients. Scientific Journal „Spectri“, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.52340/spectri.2023.08.02.04

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...