ანოტაცია
This comprehensive review examines Free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) techniques for facial reanimation, focusing on smile restoration in patients with long-term facial paralysis. Multiple neurotization techniques such as the Motor Nerve of Masseter (MNM), Cross-Facial Nerve Graft (CFNG), and Dual Innervation (DI) are explored in depth to clarify and understand the specific set of indications and advantages of each technique. A literature review was conducted using PubMed for articles published within the last 10 years. It was found that even though FFMT using the Gracilis muscle is the gold standard, DI strategies combining MNM and CFNG provide a balance of high smile excursion, resting tone and spontaneity, thus containing the advantages of both techniques. Pediatric patients demonstrate further advantages such as enhanced cortical adaptation often achieving spontaneous smiles even with MNM alone. In conclusion, careful patient selection, appropriate surgical timing, and donor nerve choice are crucial for successful FFMT outcomes. Limitations such as the heterogeneity in outcomes and non-standardized assessment methodologies restrict understanding of the area. Further research will benefit from long-term prospective studies with unified assessment modules, to directly compare and quantify functional benefits.
წყაროები
Picchio VM, Sisti A, Fasciolo A, Bertozzi N. Restoring the spontaneous smile through free functional muscle transfer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the last twenty years' experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;88:23-33.
De Cicco V, Zenga F, Penner F, Ricci L, Boffano P, Garzino-Demo P, et al. Donor nerve selection in free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2023;51(8):625-32.
Zheng Y, Wang P, Lin B, Dong S, Zhang W, Shen Y, et al. Dual Nerve Transfer for Facial Reanimation. J Craniofacial Surg. 2021;32(6):2241-4.
Agrawal D, Gupta Y, Gupta S, Sharma P, Mathur RK. Powering the Gracilis for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Based on Donor Nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(3):e2725.
De Cicco V, Garzino-Demo P, Boffano P, Zenga F, Titolo P. Effectiveness and safety of the use of gracilis muscle for dynamic smile restoration in facial paralysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2019;47(7):1118-23.
Chang S, Lee DY, Jin HR, Kwon JW, Lee JW, Lee JS, et al. Free Gracilis Transfer and Static Facial Suspension for Midfacial Reanimation in Long-Standing Flaccid Facial Palsy. J Craniofacial Surg. 2018;29(6):1652-5.
Kowal N, Tang S, Chen D. Lengthening temporalis myoplasty versus free muscle transfer with the gracilis flap for long-standing facial paralysis: A systematic review of outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(10):1328-35.
Tanaka J, Kashiwa K, Uemura T, Takagi S. Nerve Transfer for Facial Paralysis Under Intravenous Sedation and Local Analgesia for the High Surgical Risk Elderly Patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(11):2242-6.
Roxo AC, Valeriano R, Corvo M. Facial reanimation: evolving from static procedures to free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(5):409-15.
Sani MSM, Zulkifli SS, Othman Z, Hashim S. Facial nerve paralysis: A review on the evolution of implantable prosthesis in restoring dynamic eye closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(12):2577-87.
Purnell C, Lavy J, Saeed SR, Flook E. Pediatric facial reanimation: An algorithmic approach and systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(10):1743-55.
Vincent AG, Harris JA, Borschel GH, Mackinnon SE. Masseteric to buccal branch nerve transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(6):810-5.
Vincent AG, Kim J, Borschel GH, Mackinnon SE. A Contemporary Approach to Facial Reanimation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(6):1039-46.
Zuker RM, Manktelow RT, Binhammer P, Williams E, Mehara B. Double-powered free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation: A longitudinal optoelectronic study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(10):1424-8.1428.

