Emerging Neuro-Technologies for Detecting Consciousness in Locked-In Syndrome: A Review of fMRI, EEG, and Machine Learning Applications
PDF

Keywords

Locked-in syndrome
electroencephalography
machine learning
functional magnetic resonance imaging
consciousness

How to Cite

Jaber, M., Mushi, S., Thilagendra, A., Tennora, O., Dissasekara, A., & Abdalla, A. (2026). Emerging Neuro-Technologies for Detecting Consciousness in Locked-In Syndrome: A Review of fMRI, EEG, and Machine Learning Applications . Junior Researchers, 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.01.02

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical differentiation between disorders of consciousness (DOC), such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), and locked-in syndrome (LIS/CLIS) remains a formidable challenge, with misdiagnosis rates reaching up to 40%. Because traditional bedside assessments are motor-dependent, they fail to detect "covert consciousness" or "cognitive motor dissociation" (CMD) in patients who are cognitively aware but physically paralyzed. This review analyzes evidence on emerging neurotechnologies, specifically functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalogram (EEG), and machine learning (ML)—aimed to establish objective, motor-independent markers of awareness.

Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus were searched for articles that focus on locked-in syndrome and the neurotechnologies that can detect consciousness, using keywords such as “Locked-in syndrome”, “electroencephalography”, “fMRI”. Analysis was done from 22 studies, focusing on different technologies and different subgroups of unconsciousness.

Results: Out of 22 studies, transcranial magnetic stimulation-electro-EEG-derived perturbational complexity index reliably discriminates conscious from unconscious states with high sensitivity, providing a "gold standard" for bedside complexity mapping. Task-based fMRI and EEG detected command-following in 15% of behaviorally unresponsive acute patients, which serves as a powerful predictor of 12-month functional recovery. In chronic cases, resting-state fMRI demonstrated that LIS patients maintain higher default mode network (DMN) connectivity than those in UWS. Machine learning models successfully automated the detection of awareness by training on pharmacological datasets and applying them to pathological states. For the transition to completely locked-in state (CLIS), metabolic signals from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) using ECoG or LFP signals provided stable, long-term communication channels where traditional EEG paradigms often failed. Furthermore, hybrid systems integrating EEG with eye-tracking significantly improved communication accuracy in fluctuating states.

Conclusion: Emerging neurotechnologies have transformed the diagnostic landscape for locked-in syndrome, shifting reliance from overt behavior to internal neural dynamics. A multimodal diagnostic framework, combining the spatial resolution of fMRI, the temporal flexibility of EEG, and the predictive power of machine learning, is essential for accurate stratification. These advancements not only reduce misdiagnosis but also provide the technical foundation for permanent, high-speed communication interfaces for the most severely disabled patients. 

 

https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.01.02
PDF

References

Gallegos-Ayala G, Furdea A, Takano K, et al. Brain communication in a completely locked-in patient using bedside near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurology. 2014;82(21):1930-1932.

Sarasso S, Rosanova M, Casali AG, et al. Quantifying cortical EEG responses to TMS in (un)consciousness. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014;45(1):40-49.

Casarotto S, Comanducci A, Rosanova M, et al. Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(5):718-729.

Roquet D, Foucher JR, Froehlig P, et al. Resting-state networks distinguish locked-in from vegetative state patients. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:16-22.

Vansteensel MJ, Pels EG, Bleichner MG, et al. Fully implanted brain-computer interface in a locked-in patient with ALS. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2060-2066.

Guger C, Spataro R, Allison BZ, et al. Complete locked-in and locked-in patients: Command following assessment and communication with vibro-tactile P300 and motor imagery brain-computer interface tools. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:251.

Abdalmalak A, Milej D, Norton L, et al. Single-session communication with a locked-in patient by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics. 2017;4(4):040501.

Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA, et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2017;140(9):2399-2414.

Milekovic T, Sarma AA, Bacher D, et al. Stable long-term BCI-enabled communication in ALS and locked-in syndrome using LFP signals. J Neurophysiol. 2018;120(1):343-360.

Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2497-2505.

Sinitsyn DO, Poydasheva AG, Bakulin IS, et al. Detecting the potential for consciousness in unresponsive patients using the perturbational complexity index. Brain Sci. 2020;10(12):917.

Campbell J, Huang Z, Zhang J, et al. Pharmacologically informed machine learning approach for identifying pathological states of unconsciousness via resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2020;206:116316.

Wu SJ, Nicolaou N, Bogdan M. Consciousness detection in a complete locked-in syndrome patient through multiscale approach analysis. Entropy. 2020;22(12):1420.

Sinitsyn DO, Poydasheva AG, Bakulin IS, et al. Machine learning in the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness: Opportunities and challenges. In: Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. Springer; 2021:729-738.

Khalili-Ardali M, Wu S, Tonin A, Birbaumer N, Chaudhary U. Neurophysiological aspects of the completely locked-in syndrome in patients with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(5):1064-1076.

Li M, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Detecting residual awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: An fNIRS study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:618055.

Leinders S, Vansteensel MJ, Piantoni G, et al. Using fMRI to localize target regions for implanted brain-computer interfaces in locked-in syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;155:1-15.

Zilio F, Gomez-Pilar J, Chaudhary U, et al. Altered brain dynamics index levels of arousal in complete locked-in syndrome. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):757.

Gao Z, Lu M, Guo Z. Application of deep learning on classification of disorders of consciousness based on EEG frequency-domain features. In: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering. 2023:233-238.

Yi Z, Pan J, Chen Z, et al. A hybrid BCI integrating EEG and eye-tracking for assisting clinical communication in patients with disorders of consciousness. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:2759-2770.

Lo CCH, Woo PYM, Cheung VCK. Task-based EEG and fMRI paradigms in a multimodal clinical diagnostic framework for disorders of consciousness. Rev Neurosci. 2024;35(7):775-787.

Adama S, Bogdan M. Assessing consciousness in patients with locked-in syndrome using their EEG. Front Neurosci. 2025;19:1604173.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.