Actual issues of property rights reform in Georgia

Authors

  • Maka Kartozia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/isj.2022.26.08

Keywords:

property, ownership, agricultural land, entrepreneurship, court, judiciary, shares, reform, Georgia, France, Germany, Slovenia, Slovakia, constitution, legislation, convention, declaration

Abstract

Creating legal framework and institutional guarantees compatible to modern standards of protection of human rights is among the main issues for Georgia. Georgia’s transition from soviet state to modern democracy is determined by the state of free entrepreneurship, free market economy and protection of property rights. Institutional reforms and conducted privatization underlined the importance of property rights, effective mechanisms of protection this rights and states limitation to interfere in and regulate these rights. Developing its state and democracy, Georgia had different approach concerning the ownership of agricultural land and creating mechanisms for protection of property rights of owners of real estate. At the initial state of reforms and privatization, the property right on agricultural land was granted only to Georgian citizens, while foreign citizens were permitted just lease, rent and possession. Later, companies registered in Georgia were added to the subjects of the property right on agricultural land. Next and important stage of developing property right on agricultural land was determined by the decision of Constitutional Court of Georgia declaring contradictory to the constitutional standards of property rights. Constitutional court declared that legal restriction and differentiation of foreign citizens’ rights on agricultural land contradicts to the property right granted by the Constitution of Georgia, because constitution does not consider such possibility for differentiation. Parliament with last constitutional changes in 2017, changed constitutional standard on agricultural land ownership and added provision granting the power of government to limit property rights on agricultural land of foreign citizens and foreign companies. This article analyses the practice of development of Georgian legislation and practice and compares to the German, French, Slovenia’s and Slovakia’s experience. Another actual issue discussed in this article concerns the importance of developing effective mechanisms additional to the judicial, for protecting owners’ rights. For a decade in Georgia existed non-judiciary administrative mechanism for protection of owners of real estate. While judiciary reform, weakly developed judiciary and time consuming proceedings was not effective and enough for protection and it was added by administrative execution, so called police extraction. Declaring priority of possessors’ rights protection over the owners’ rights, the Parliament of Georgia revoked this mechanism. Actual issues, problems and possible solutions for property right protection are analyzed in this article. Articulating the problems, analyzing legal basis and suggesting possible solutions, author supports the scientific discussion and research. This can assist to improve a practice of protection of property right, strengthening investing climate and free market economy, where ownership rights are duly guaranteed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maka Kartozia

Doctor of  Law  Professor - Caucasus University,  East European University (Georgia)

References

.C. Arsenault, Property Rights for World's Poor Could Unlock Trillions in 'Dead Capital': Economist, Thomson Reuters Foundation, August 1, 2016, 14.

.Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations, 1948, Article 17.

.The First Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1, Council of Europe, in force for Georgia on 27 December 2001.

.The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Council of Europe, has been in force for Georgia since 20 May 1999.

.Constitution of Georgia, Herald of the Parliament of Georgia, №31-33, 24/08/1995.

.Law of Georgia on Ownership of Agricultural Land, Herald of the Parliament of Georgia, №007, 30/04/1996.

.Civil Code of Georgia, Herald of the Parliament of Georgia, №31, 24/07/1997.

.F. Thiel, Property Entails Obligations: Land and Property Law in Germany, European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance, Vol.1, No.1, Summer 2011, 77.

.Law of Georgia on Agricultural Land Ownership, Herald of the Parliament of Georgia, №007, 30/04/1996

.Ibid, Article 5.2

.Ibid, Article 7.6.

.Law of Georgia on Amendments to the Law of Georgia on Agricultural Land Ownership, Legislative Herald of Georgia, №23, 23/06/2000.

.Resolution of the Parliament of Georgia on the Ratification of the First Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Legislative Herald of Georgia, №6, 17/01/2002.

.Constitutional Law of Georgia on On Changes and Amendments to the Constitution of Georgia, Article 1.4, Legislative Herald of Georgia, №62, 05/11/2010, Article 1.4.

.Judgment of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in the case - Danish citizen Heike Kronkvist v. Parliament of Georgia, №3 / 1/512, 26.06.2012.

.Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in the case - Austrian citizen Matthias Hutter v. Parliament of Georgia, №1 / 2/563, 24.06.2014.

.Constitutional Law of Georgia “On Amendments to the Constitution of Georgia”, Legislative Herald of Georgia, web, 19/10/2017.

.J. Joel, Assessing Human Rights and Judiciary Issues in the Draft Constitutional Review, Tbilisi, 2017, 15

.Regarding the moratorium on lands, some legislative changes may be made, 23.04.2018, see. [www.interpressnews.ge].

.I. Schwabe, Decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, Tbilisi,2011, 251, 400.

.I. Holger Magel, Land Policy and Land Management in Germany, Public lecture in Melbourne, 6 February, 2003, 7.

.Evaluation of the Structural Effects of Direct Support, Final Report, Brussels, 2013, 69.

.Ibid, 77.

.Ibid, 67-68.

.P. Ciaian, d’A. Kancs, J. Swinnen, K. Van Herck, L. Vranken, Sales Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries, Factor Markets, Working Paper, No. 14, February 2012, 14-15.

.Evaluation of the Structural Effects of Direct Support, Final Report, Brussels, 2013, 77.

.On the need for a state strategy to consolidate agricultural land, Europe for Georgia, 20.06.2017, see [http://eugeorgia.info/ka/article/632/sasoflo-sameurneo-miwebis-konsolidaciis--saxelmwifo-strategiis-aucileblobis-shesaxeb/].

.Assessment of Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in Eastern Partnership Countries - Georgia, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012, 9, 14, see [http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/009/aq673ka/aq673ka.pdf].

.Local Self-Governance Code, Legislative Herald of Georgia, website,19/04/2014, articles 107, 162

.Organic Law of Georgia "On the Ownership of Agricultural Land", Sakartvelos Sakanonmdeblo Matsne, website, 25 September 2019 and Law of Georgia "On Determining the Purpose of Land and Sustainable Management of Agricultural Land", Sakartvelos Sakanonmdeblo Matsne, website 25/09/2019.

.Л. Chanturia, Law of Credit Security, Tbilisi,2012, 35.

.З. Chechelashvili, Law of Goods, Tbilisi, 2016, 107.

.Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in the case - Citizens of Georgia - David Jimsheleishvili, Tariel Guvetadze and Neli Dalalishvili v. Parliament of Georgia,№1/2/384, 02.07.2007.

.Decision of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in the case - Danish Citizen Heike Kronqvist v. Parliament of Georgia,№3/1/512, 26.06.2012.

.Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case - Citizens of Georgia: Konstantin Kubaneishvili, Mikhail Gumbatashvili and Teimuraz Mirazanashvili v. Parliament of Georgia, President of Georgia and Minister of Interior of Georgia№1/4/445, 04.04.2008.

.Decision of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia, №ას-189-182-2013, 16.01.2016.

.Law of Georgia on Amendments to the Civil Code of Georgia, Sakartvelos Sakanonmdeblo Matsne., №48, 22/12/2006.

.Order No. 747 of the Minister of Internal Affairs of Georgia "On Approval of the Rules on Prevention of Encroachments or Other Interferences with Real Estate", Legislative Herald of Georgia, №75, 29/05/2007.

.The so-called police eviction statistics for 7 years, Business Media Georgia,13.03.2018, see [http://www.businessmediageorgia.ge/ka/article/ew-quotsapolicio-gamosaxlebebisquot-7-wliani-statistika-/17588].

.I. Krofoller, German Civil Code, Training Commentary, Tbilisi, 2014, 858.

.Draft Law on Amendments and Additions to the Civil Code of Georgia.№07-3/125, Author Gedevan Popkhadze, initiator 49 members of the Parliament of Georgia,11.07.2013, see [https://info.parliament.ge/#law-drafting/6235].

.Draft Law on Amendments to the Civil Code of Georgia. №07-3/441/8, Author and initiator of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Parliament of Georgia, 19.05.2015, see [https://info.parliament.ge/#law-drafting/9279].

.Administration of the Government of Georgia, Business Ombudsman of Georgia, Ministry of Justice of Georgia, National Bureau of Enforcement.

.Law of Georgia on Amendments to the Civil Code of Georgia, Legislative Herald of Georgia, website, 29/12/2015.

.No one has the right to enter a dwelling or other property against the will of the owners, as well as to conduct a search, unless there is a court decision or an urgent need provided by law.

.Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case - Giorgi Nodia, a citizen of Georgia, NNLE “Association of Georgian Banks” and NNLE “Georgian Business Association” v. Parliament of Georgia, №1/1/791, 07.02.2017.

."Abolishing the police eviction rule was not the right decision, I think the new parliament will reconsider this initiative," Business MediaGeorgia 23.10.2016., see [www.businessmediageorgia.ge].

."Property rights have deteriorated and additional cases have been added to the overcrowded court," Business MediaGeorgia 29.01.2017, see. [www.businessmediageorgia.ge].

.Draft Law on the Rule of Expropriation of Property for Essential Public Needs and Amendments to the Civil Code of Georgia №07-2/57/9, Author Government of Georgia, Initiator Government of Georgia, 05.04.2017, see [https://info.parliament.ge/#law-drafting/13732].

Downloads

Published

2023-03-05

How to Cite

Kartozia, M. (2023). Actual issues of property rights reform in Georgia. International Scientific Journal "The Caucasus and the World", (26). https://doi.org/10.52340/isj.2022.26.08

Issue

Section

LAW