EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LABOR INDUCTION, PERFORMED IN THE DIFFERENT GESTATIONAL TERMS: ОЦЕНКА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ИНДУКЦИИ РОДОВ В РАЗНЫЕ ГЕСТАЦИОННЫЕ СРОКИ

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LABOR INDUCTION, PERFORMED IN THE DIFFERENT GESTATIONAL TERMS

ОЦЕНКА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ИНДУКЦИИ РОДОВ В РАЗНЫЕ ГЕСТАЦИОННЫЕ СРОКИ

Authors

  • Konstantine Kharabadze East European university
  • D. KOBESHAVIDZE

Abstract

The objection was to compare the efficiency of labor induction in less than 41 weeks and more than 41 weeks gestational ages. Respectively there was formed two clinical groups of pregnant women (75 and 49), having indications for labor induction. Comparative analysis has revealed more efficiency of induction, performed till 41 weeks, than after 41 weeks. Obtained dates fully coincide with official considerations about safety and high effectiveness of induction, performed in less than 41 weeks of gestation, for improving maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Баев О.Р., Бабич Д.А. и др. Опыт применения двухбаллонного катетера для подготовки к родам. “Акушерство и гинекология'', 2019; 3; 64-71.

Баев О.Р., Бабич Д.А. сравнение эффективности индукции родов при беременности “Full term” и “Late term”. «Акущерство и гинекология”, 2020; 2; 97-103.

Бабич Д.А.; Баев О.Р. и др. Применение баллонных катетеров для подготовки шейки матки к родам. Медицинский оппонент, 2018; 1(2): 24-31.

Baev O.R., Rumyanseva V.P., et all. Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labor in full-term pregnancy. ,,EUR. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 2017; 144-9.

Chen H.I., Grobman W.A. et all. Neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among low-risk parous women at 39-41 weeks of gestation. “Obstet. Gynecol.”; 2019; 134(2): 288-94.

Chen H.I.; Grobman W.A. et all. Neonatal and maternal morbidity among low-risk nulliparous women at 39-41 weeks of gestation. “Obstet. Gynecol.”; 2019, 133(4): 729-37.

Grobman W.A.; Rice M.M. et all. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. “N. Eng. J. Med.”; 2018; 379(6): 513-23.

Jazwiak M., Oude Rengerink et all. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of laborat term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomized controlled trial. “Lancet”, 2011; 378(9809): 2095-103.

Jazwiak M., Blaemenkamp K.W., et all. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Coshrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; (3): CD001233.

Sinkey R.G., Blanchard C.T., et all. Elective induction of labor in the 39th. Week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women. “Obstet. Gynecol.”. 2019; 134(2): 282-287.

Spong C.Y. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommendations from the defining ,,term’’ pregnancy workgroup. JAMA. 2013; 309(23): 2445-6.

Vaknin Z., Kurzweil Y. et all. Foley catheter balloon versus locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systemic review and metaanalysis. “Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.”, 2010; 203(5): 418-29.

Published

2021-05-10

How to Cite

Kharabadze, K. ., & D. KOBESHAVIDZE. (2021). EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LABOR INDUCTION, PERFORMED IN THE DIFFERENT GESTATIONAL TERMS: ОЦЕНКА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ИНДУКЦИИ РОДОВ В РАЗНЫЕ ГЕСТАЦИОННЫЕ СРОКИ. Experimental and Clinical Medicine Georgia, (1). Retrieved from https://journals.4science.ge/index.php/jecm/article/view/317

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...