Integrating GIS and Kernel Density Estimation for Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Potential Onshore Pipeline Failures

Integrating GIS and Kernel Density Estimation for Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Potential Onshore Pipeline Failures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/ggj.2025.05.03.02

Keywords:

GIS, Kernel Density Estimation, Risk Matrix, Pipeline Integrity, Multi-Hazard Risk

Abstract

This paper introduces a newly developed risk-assessment framework that combines Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) with Geographic Information System (GIS) technology to analyze multiple hazards, including earthquakes, floods, landslides, mud volcanoes, and soil erosion, for the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline in Azerbaijan. By integrating hazard-specific parameters into a unified risk matrix, each hazard’s contribution is weighted, refined, and aggregated to produce a spatially explicit, combined risk map. KDE smooths hazard intensities and reveals overlaps among different risk factors. The resulting high-resolution maps enable more targeted prevention and response measures, guiding planners and stakeholders toward effective pipeline protection strategies. Although the model can demand computational power, it remains scalable and flexible, allowing for adaptation to additional hazards or expanded geographical areas. Furthermore, the methodology underscores the importance of cross-validation in setting KDE bandwidth and in calibrating hazard weights to ensure reliable outputs. Preliminary testing indicates that this integrated model improves the clarity of risk data, highlights areas needing immediate attention, and supports resilience planning across the pipeline corridor. This work can be applied more broadly to critical infrastructure projects in regions where multiple hazards coincide, thereby aiding decision-making processes for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Future research will focus on refining statistical models for inter-hazard correlations and incorporating machine learning for predictive analytics. The framework stands as a tool to maintain pipeline integrity in the face of evolving environmental threats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aslan E. Babakhanov, Institute of Geography named after academician H.A. Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan

Department of Tourism and Recreational Geography, Ministry of Science and Education, Institute of Geography named after academician H.A. Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan

Zaur T. Imrani, Institute of Geography named after academician H.A. Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan

Department of Tourism and Recreational Geography, Ministry of Science and Education, Institute of Geography named after academician H.A. Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan

References

Alizadeh, A.A., Guliyev, I.S., Kadirov, F.A., Eppelbaum L.V. (2017). Geosciences of Azerbaijan - Volume II: Economic Geology and Applied Geophysics.

Amirova‐Mammadova, S. (2018). Pipeline Politics and Natural Gas Supply from Azerbaijan to Europe: Challenges and Perspectives. Springer.

Bagirov, E., Nadirov, R., & Lerche, I. (1996). Earthquakes, mud volcano eruptions, and fracture formation hazards in the South Caspian Basin: Statistical inferences from the historical record. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 14(6), 585-606.

Blokdyk, G. (2018). Risk Matrix a Complete Guide. 5starcooks.

Cheng, Y. F. (2015). Pipeline corrosion. Journal Title, 161-162. https://doi.org/10.1179/1478422X15Z.000000000357

Gemma C., Carmine G., John McCloskey (2022). Modelling and quantifying tomorrow's risks from natural hazards. Science of The Total Environment, Volume 817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152552.

Gramacki, A. (2017). Nonparametric Kernel Density Estimation and Its Computational Aspects. Springer.

Falcone D., G. Di Bona, Forcina (2022). A new method for risk assessment in industrial processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(19) 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.175

Fotios P., Daniele A., Vassilios A., Mohamed Zied Babai, Devon K. Barrow. (2022). Forecasting: theory and practice, International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001

Han, Z., & Weng, W. (2010). An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23(3), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003

Ilachinski, A., & Zane. (2001). Cellular Automata – A Discrete Universe. Kybernetes, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/k.2003.06732dae.007

Kadirov F.A, Lerche I, Guliyev I.S, Kadyrov A.G, Feyzullayev A.A, Mukhtarov A.Sh. (2005). Deep Structure Model and Dynamics of Mud Volcanoes, Southwest Absheron Peninsula (Azerbaijan). Energy Exploration & Exploitation. 23(5):307-332. doi:10.1260/014459805775992717

Katopodis, T., & Sfetsos, A. (2019). A review of climate change impacts to oil sector critical services and suggested recommendations for industry uptake. Infrastructures, 4(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040074

Krausmann, E., Cruz, A. M., & Salzano, E. (2016). Natech Risk Assessment and Management: Reducing the Risk of Natural-Hazard Impact on Hazardous Installations. Elsevier.

Krausmann, E., Renni, E., Campedel, M., & Cozzani, V. (2011). Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Natural Hazards, 59(1), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3

Lerche, I., & Bagirov, E. (2014). Impact of Natural Hazards on Oil and Gas Extraction. Springer.

Nasser, H. (2014). Learning ArcGIS Geodatabases. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Novacheck, J., Sharp, J., Schwarz, M., Donohoo-Vallett, P., Tzavelis, Z., Buster, G., & Rossol, M. (2021). The evolving role of extreme weather events in the U.S. power system with high levels of variable renewable energy. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Oruji, S., Ketabdar, M., & Ketabdar, M. (2022). Evaluation of land subsidence hazard on steel natural gas pipelines in California. Upstream Oil and Gas Technology.

Othman, A., El-Saoud, W. A., Habeebullah, T., Shaaban, F., & Abotalib, A. Z. (2023). Risk assessment of flash flood and soil erosion impacts on electrical infrastructures in overcrowded mountainous urban areas under climate change. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109302

Panahi, B.M. (2005). Mud Volcanism, Geodynamics and Seismicity of Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea Region. In: Martinelli, G., Panahi, B. (eds) Mud Volcanoes, Geodynamics and Seismicity. NATO Science Series, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3204-8_7

Petersen, K. (2020). Visualizing Risk: Drawing Together and Pushing Apart with Sociotechnical Practices.

Rasouli, A., & Imrani, Z. (2023). Object-Based Analysis for Risk and Disasters Assessment: Tutoring on Geo-Environmental Contexts of Azerbaijan. Baku: CN Poliqraf LLC. 430. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14885894

Samany, N.N., Liu, H., Aghataher, R. et al. (2022). Ten GIS-Based Solutions for Managing and Controlling COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01150-9

Silverman, B.W. (2018). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Routledge.

Zio, E. (2016). Critical Infrastructures Vulnerability and Risk Analysis. Eur J Secur Res 1, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-016-0004-2

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Babakhanov, A. E., & Imrani, Z. T. (2025). Integrating GIS and Kernel Density Estimation for Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Potential Onshore Pipeline Failures. Georgian Geographical Journal, 5(3), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.52340/ggj.2025.05.03.02

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...