DETECTION OF OVERREACHING AND OVERTRAINING DUE TO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN HIGH LEVEL ATHLETES WITH USE OF CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA (GEORGIA)
PDF

How to Cite

Kajaia, T., Chelidze, K., Akhalkatsi, V., Kakhabrishvili, Z., & Maskhulia, L. (2019). DETECTION OF OVERREACHING AND OVERTRAINING DUE TO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN HIGH LEVEL ATHLETES WITH USE OF CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA (GEORGIA). Collection of Scientific Works of Tbilisi State Medical University, 49, 122–125. https://doi.org/10.52340/csw.2015.49.0.122-125

Abstract

 The goal of training competitive athletes is to provide training loads that will improve performance. When prolonged, excessive training occurs concurrent with other stressors and insufficient recovery, performance decrement can result first in functional overreaching (FO), then extreme overreaching or non-functional overreaching (NFO) and overtraining. Chronic maladaptations may lead then to the overtraining syndrome (OTS). As it is possible to recover from functional overreaching within a period of 2 weeks, the recovery from NFO needs several weeks or even months. Athletes who suffer from OTS may need months or even years to completely recover (1). Early diagnostic of overreaching is of high importance for prevention of overtraining as well as for interruption of progression of NFO/OTS.   The purpose of the study was detection of nonfunctional overreaching and overtraining with use of contemporary diagnostic criteria.   Diagnosis of OTS was based on the checklist provided by the consensus statement of the European College of Sports Science (ECSS) and the American College of Sports Medicine  (ACSM) (3). Examination of 348 high level athletes revealed 43 subjects with NFO/OTS, among them 37 with NFO and 6 athletes with OTS. Prevalence of NFO and OTS was seen in sporting disciplines with mixed high intensity workload-27(62,8%) NFO and 4 (9,3%) OTS, particularly, majority of NFO/OTS was revealed in wrestling: NFO – 19 (44,2%) and OTS – 4 (9,3%). Checklist criteria elaborated by ECSS and ACSM is efficient and flexible tool for diagnosing  overreaching and overtraining in athletes. Most frequently NFO/OTS is seen in wrestling, which needs further investigation and regular medical monitoring.

https://doi.org/10.52340/csw.2015.49.0.122-125
PDF

References

1.Meeusen R, Duclos M, Gleeson M. et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: ECSS Position Statement Task Force. Eur J Sport Sci, 2006; 6(1):1-14.
2.Hartmann U., Mester J. Training and overtraining markers in selected sport events. Med Sci Sport Exerc, Volume 32, Issue 1, 2000 (January), p. 209-215.
3. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sports Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45:186-205.
4. Wyatt F, Donaldson A, Brown E. The overtraining syndrome: A meta-analytic review. J Exerc Physiol 2013, vol 16/2:12-23.
5. Kellmann M. Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2010: 20 (Suppl. 2): 95-102.
6. Kenttä, G., Hassmén, P., Raglin, J. Mood state monitoring of training and recovery in elite kayakers. European Journal of Sport Science,2006: 6, 245-253.
7.Halson S. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. J Sports Med, 2014: 44 (2):139-147.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...