Challenges Facing Small Countries in the Contemporary International System: Structural Vulnerabilities, Strategic Choices, and Prospects for Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/spectri.2025.11.01.16Keywords:
Small states, structural vulnerability, resilience, strategic autonomy, political economy, cybersecurity, demographic change, environmental security, great-power rivalry, institutional capacity, economic diversification, climate adaptation, digital sovereignty, governance overload, global interdependenceAbstract
Small states occupy a structurally distinct position within the international system, one characterized by both acute vulnerability and notable adaptive capacity. This article offers a comprehensive, multidisciplinary analysis of the challenges confronting small states amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry, accelerating climate change, rapid technological transformation, and global economic volatility. Drawing on structural realism, political economy, environmental security, and small-state studies, the paper demonstrates that vulnerabilities arise from a combination of intrinsic limitations—limited population size, constrained domestic markets, narrow talent pools, and minimal strategic depth—and exogenous systemic pressures generated by global change. Through a qualitative, theory-informed comparative approach, the study evaluates how these vulnerabilities manifest across security, economic, demographic, environmental, technological, and societal domains. The analysis reveals that small states face structurally embedded constraints: asymmetric security exposure, dependence on external markets and technology, demographic decline, governance overload, environmental fragility, and susceptibility to information influence and geopolitical coercion. Yet the paper argues that small states are not passive recipients of structural pressures. Rather, they deploy a repertoire of adaptive strategies including institutional modernization, economic diversification, investment in human capital, climate adaptation, strategic diplomacy, digital autonomy, and the cultivation of social cohesion. These strategies allow small states to convert structural disadvantages into opportunities for agility, innovation, and strategic relevance. The conclusion contends that resilience for small states is best conceptualized as a dynamic process of adaptive governance rather than a static condition. The long-term viability and agency of small states will depend on their ability to align domestic capabilities with global transformations, navigate great-power politics without sacrificing autonomy, and institutionalize resilience as a core dimension of statecraft. In doing so, small states can mitigate systemic risks and enhance their international positioning despite profound structural constraints.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, H. W., & Read, R. (2002). The phantom of liberty? Economic growth and the vulnerability of small states. Journal of International Development, 14(4), 435–458.
Awuah, G., & Amal, M. (2011). Impact of globalization: The ability of less developed countries’ (LDCs’) firms to cope with opportunities and challenges. European Business Review, 23(1), 120–132.
Baldacchino, G. (Ed.). (2015). Entrepreneurship in small island states and territories (1st ed.). Routledge.
Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). The diplomacies of small states: Between vulnerability and resilience. Palgrave Macmillan.
McElroy, J. L., & Pearce, K. (2006). The advantages of political affiliation: Dependent and independent small-island profiles. The Round Table: Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 95(386), 529–539.
Thorhallsson, B. (2023). Small states and the politics of vulnerability in the globalized era. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
