The Future Is Cyborg: Neuroprosthetic Interfaces to Aid Parkinsonian Motor Dysfunction
pdf (English)

საკვანძო სიტყვები

Brain-computer interface
Parkinson’s disease
neuroprosthetics
soft robotics
motion prediction

როგორ უნდა ციტირება

Abitkar, A. S. (2025). The Future Is Cyborg: Neuroprosthetic Interfaces to Aid Parkinsonian Motor Dysfunction. ახალგაზრდა მკვლევარები, 3(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2025.03.02.15

ანოტაცია

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by deteriorating motor function, bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and freezing. Available treatments have not always been effective in fully alleviating these symptoms. This review proposes a revolutionary solution in the present case: the possible way ahead through integration of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), soft robotics, and neuroadaptive control systems to assist motor function in PD, for a future not only technology to the body but also to extend the brain.
We reviewed the literature available including papers that discussed BCI modalities (EEG, EMG, invasive implants), commercially available systems, and soft robotic exosuits. We examined their real-time responsiveness, neuroplastic integration potential, and feasibility in assisting freezing episodes, gait instability, and tremor. Motion prediction algorithms, tactile feedback systems, and AI-augmented learning platforms were also analyzed and conceptual mockups for wearable assistive prototypes were created to illustrate the therapeutic applications.
Key findings indicate the feasibility of using non-invasive EEG-based BCIs to detect motor function with increasing accuracy. EMG-controlled prosthetic limbs have shown a promise in enhancing stride length and stability in preliminary trials. Integration of these AI models has shown to improve adaptation to an individual’s movement patterns. Conceptual designs suggest a potential for a portable, tremor-dampening wearable device utilizing gyroscopic feedback and predictive control loops.
Neuroprosthetic systems are a revolution in the treatment of PD, one by which depleting motor function can be bypassed by cognitive translation and external prosthetic enhancement. In spite of the difficulty of biocompatibility, latency, and availability, these developments will redefine ‘treating’ Parkinson’s disease. They will bring about not just movement, but empowerment, to a future where the line between humans and machines grows thinner and hope grows stronger.

https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2025.03.02.15
pdf (English)

წყაროები

Zhang, H., Jiao, L., Yang, S., Li, H., Jiang, X., Feng, J., Zou, S., Xu, Q., Gu, J., Wang, X., & Wei, B. (2024). Brain-computer interfaces: The innovative key to unlocking neurological conditions. International Journal of Surgery, 110(9), 5745–5762. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000002022

Oliveira, A. M., Coelho, L., Carvalho, E., Ferreira-Pinto, M. J., Vaz, R., & Aguiar, P. (2023). Machine learning for adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: closing the loop. Journal of Neurology, 270(11), 5313–5326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11873-1

Gryfe, P., Sexton, A., & Mcgibbon, C. A. (2022). Using gait robotics to improve symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: an open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07549-9

Kim, J., Porciuncula, F., Yang, H. D., Wendel, N., Baker, T., Chin, A., Ellis, T. D., & Walsh, C. J. (2024). Soft robotic apparel to avert freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Nature Medicine, 30(1), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02731-8

Shin, S. Y., Hohl, K., Giffhorn, M., Awad, L. N., Walsh, C. J., & Jayaraman, A. (2022c). Soft robotic exosuit augmented high intensity gait training on stroke survivors: a pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01034-2

Jankovic, J. (2008). Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 79(4), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045

Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. (2006b). Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(9), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004

Herr, H. (2009). Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-21

Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2012). Brain-Computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008

Kwak, N., Müller, K., & Lee, S. (2017). A convolutional neural network for steady state visual evoked potential classification under ambulatory environment. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172578

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.