The essence and composition of an administrative offense under the Code of Administrative Offenses of Georgia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/isj.2024.27.08Keywords:
Administrative offenses, composition, object, subjectAbstract
The basis for administrative liability is administrative offense (administrative misconduct). At the same time, responsibility for administrative action on the case, if the illegal action does not lead to criminal liability. According to administrative science and practice, the essence of an administrative offense is the use of administrative sanctions by the state authorities against persons who violate the norms prescribed by Code of Administrative Offenses or other normative acts. An administrative offense is an unlawful, guilty and punishable act of a natural and / or legal person.
Offenses, as a widespread social event, affect the most diverse areas of public life. They are distinguished by their high dynamics. Offenses are the result of human behavior, and human behavior in turn depends on both social and biological factors. Moreover, social factors should be given priority, as a person is formed and acts in a certain social environment and his actions depend not so much on the physiological characteristics and condition of the body but on different levels and relationships of society.
An administrative offense, like a criminal offense, has a composition (not a crime, but misconduct), which includes: Subject, object, subjective side, objective side. The existence of these elements is necessary in order to obtain a complete composition of the law, which is very important when considering cases of administrative offense by the competent authorities.
Downloads
References
. Code of Administrative Offenses of Georgia, as of 2024
. Salkhinashvili M., Loria V., Administrative fines and their use, Tb., 2000, p. 18.
http://nbe.gov.ge/index.php?sec_id=518&lang_id=GEO 2021.01.20
. Article 10 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Georgia. As of 2024
. Tsyganova T. A. The mechanism for bringing legal entities to administrative responsibility in European countries. Problems of economics and legal practice. 2'2018
. Law of the Republic of Slovenia “On Misdemeanors” dated December 12, 2002, Wolters Kluwer Publishing House, Moscow, 2011.
. Tribunal Constitucional de Espania TEC 132/2001 de8 junio
Law on responsibility for přestupky a řízení o nich. Zákon no. 250/2016 Coll. Effective from 01.07.2017 https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2016-250 (2021.01.15)
. Gamero Casado E. y Fernandez Ramos S. Manual basico administrative. Madrid, 2005. P.365.
Lopez Agiiera V. Sancones Administrativas//URL:unne.edu.ar/unnevieja/Web/cyt/2001/1-Sociales/S-031.pdf
. Fodor E.M. General principles of administractive sanctions in Romanian Law//Fiat Iusticia. 2007.#1
. Law of the Republic of Austria “On Administrative Punishments”, Wolters Kluwer Publishing House, Moscow, 2011.
. Law of the Italian Republic of November 24, 1981 No. 689 “Changes to the criminal system”, Wolters Kluwer Publishing House, Moscow, 2011.
. The essence and composition of administrative offenses Justice and Law #1(65) 2020
. How to stop Georgia's unconstitutional use of administrative offenses legislation. Report of the Judicial Independence and Legal Empowerment Project (JILEP), 15 October 2013.
. Lika Kobaladze Proceedings of cases of administrative violations, procedural features of their consideration (TSU) Tbilisi 2011
. Ketevan Tskhadadze, Administrative Misdemeanor and its Separation from Criminal Crime, Journal of Justice, 2008, #2)
. Maka Salkhinashvili, Administrative offense and responsibility, Journal of Justice and Law, #2’08
. Gamkrelidze O., Criminal law problems, Volume 1, Tbilisi, 2011, 87-88.
. Liana Giorgadze The place of the law of administrative offenses in the legal system of Georgia - an effective model of codification Liana Giorgadze. The place of the law of administrative offenses in the legal system of Georgia - an effective model of codification. Tbilisi 2016