Exemption from criminal liability for necessary repulsion (comparative analysis)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/isj.2024.27.07Abstract
The article discusses exemption from criminal liability in case of necessary repulsion. Attention is focused on the place and content of this institution in the legislation of foreign countries. The conditions that must be met by the necessary repulsion in order for it to be considered as a circumstance excluding liability are discussed. A comparative analysis has also been made with the legislation of Georgia, and the common signs that are a prerequisite for being released from criminal responsibility in the case of repulsion have been highlighted.
Downloads
References
Dodonov V.N., Comparative criminal law, M., 2009, p. 220
Kherkheulidze I., Necessary repulsion in Georgian and common (Anglo-Saxon type) law, dissertation, for obtaining the academic degree of Doctor of Laws, 2008, p. 77-78
Kherkheulidze I., Necessary repulsion in Georgian and common (Anglo-Saxon type) law, dissertation, for obtaining the academic degree of Doctor of Laws, 2008, p. 91-92
Criminal Law Federal Republic Germany – Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) – p.90
Johannes Wessels, Werner Beulke, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 38 neu bearbeitete Auflage, p. 179
Johannes Wessels, Werner Beulke, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 38 neu bearbeitete Auflage, p. 183
French Criminal Code, 1994
French Criminal l Code, 1994
French Criminal Code, 1994
Criminal Code of Canada, 1985
Austrian Criminal Code, 1997
The Criminal Code of Israel, 2010
The Criminal Code of Israel, 2010
Russian Federation Criminal Code, 1996
Georgian Criminal Code, 1999
Shengelia A., Dolidze T., General part of criminal law (auxiliary manual), 2016, p. 63, 66
Collective of authors, (ed.: G. Nachkbia, N. Todua), criminal law (manual), general part, chap. 2016, p. 388
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
