Personal pronouns in Georgian Sign Language

Personal pronouns in Georgian Sign Language

Authors

  • Tamar Makharoblidze Ilia State University,Tbilisi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/idw.2025.33

Keywords:

Georgian sign language, GESL, pronouns, morphology, sign languages

Abstract

        In my book “Georgian Sign Language,” I reviewed in detail the pronouns in this language (pp. 244-288) and systematically contrasted these forms with those in spoken Georgian. It is important to note that there is an opinion according to which, in general, we do not have pronouns in sign languages, and these are deictic forms. Indeed, if we look at the data of Georgian Sign Language - GESL, the first, second, and third person pronouns are deictic forms and not the proper lexical signs. This is generally a common occurrence for sign languages. The linguistic logic here is quite clear. It is worth noting that somatic vocabulary in nouns is also referential or pointing. Almost all sign languages ​​have a way of pointing body parts. Thus, in these languages, ‘foot’, ‘heart’, ‘knee’, ‘head’, ‘eye’, ‘nose’, ‘mouth’, etc. will be represented in the same way.

It is noteworthy that GESL (like many other sign languages) does not distinguish between class or gender categories in pronouns. Against this background, it is important to note that GESL, as a three-dimensional system, prioritizes the emphasis on spatial marking. Pronouns in sign languages ​​can be represented in manual and non-manual forms. The non-manual form usually refers to the mimic version of the corresponding sign. In the case of pronouns, this can also be a gaze. Thus, we have the following forms of pronouns:

  1. Manual forms, when the personal pronouns are deictic forms;
  2. Mimic forms, when facial expressions express a particular pronoun;
  3. Forms with gaze, when the gaze indicates a specific person. This form is also deictic in nature.

From the three versions listed above, by their combinations, we obtain the following two-member possibilities:

  1. A combination of manual and gaze;
  2. A combination of gaze and mimic.

A three-membered combination is also possible:

  1. A combination of gaze, manual and mimic forms.

Based on the GESL data, it should be said that the last three-member combination is used relatively less, neither the combination of manual and gaze is frequent in GESL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• მახარობლიძე თ. (2024) ლინგვისტური წერილები - VI. წიგნის ფაბრიკა. თბილისი. 268 გვ.

• მახარობლიძე თ. (2019) ქართული ჟესტური ენის ზმნის მორფოლოგია. ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი. შოთა რუსთაველის ეროვნული სამეცნიერო ფონდი. თბილისი. ISBN 978-9941-18-331-7. 248გვ.

• მახარობლიძე თ. (2015) ქართული ჟესტურის ენის ლექსიკონი. ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, შოთა რუსთაველის ეროვნული სამეცნიერო ფონდი. თბილისი. ISBN 978-9941-16-225-5 1368 gv.

• მახარობლიძე თ. (2012) ქართული ჟესტური ენა. საქართველოს განათლებისა და მეცნიერების სამინისტრო. USAID, Save The Children International. თბილისი 610-გვ.

• Boyes Braem, P., & Sutton-Spence, R. (Eds.). (2001). The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum.

• Carmel, S. J. (1992). A checklist of dictionaries of national sign languages of Deaf people. Sign Language Studies, 76(3), 233–252.

• Cormier Kearsy, Schembri Adam , Woll Bencie (20013) pronouns and ointing in Sign languages. Lingua. Vol. 137. December 2013 Pp.230-247

• Emmorey K. (2003) Sign Language Lexicography. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4 –34-1 In book: International handbook of modern lexis and lexicography. Chapter: Online at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4 –34-1. Publisher: Springer

• Frederiksen Anne Therese & Mayberry Rachel I. (2020) Pronoun production and comprehension in American Sign Language: the interaction of space, grammar, and semantics. Pp. 80-102

• Johnston, T. A., & Schembri, A. (1999). On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics, 2(2), 115–185.

• Kristoffersen, J. H., & Troelsgård, T. (2012). The electronic lexicographical treatment of sign languages: The Danish Sign Language Dictionary. In S. Granger & M. Paquot (Eds.), Electronic Lexicography (1st ed., pp. 293–318). Oxford: Oxford University Press

• Stokoe, W. C. (1960/2005). Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Reprinted in Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 3–37.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-09

How to Cite

Makharoblidze, T. (2025). Personal pronouns in Georgian Sign Language. "Intercultural Dialogues" Transactions, 8, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.52340/idw.2025.33

Issue

Section

LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS
Loading...