Emerging Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review
PDF

Keywords

CRISPR-Cas Systems
Gene Editing
Diabetes Mellitus Type1
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Pancreatic Beta Cells
Insulin Resistance
Gene Delivery Systems

How to Cite

Tasnim, F., Prakash, A., & Touqier, H. (2026). Emerging Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review. Junior Researchers, 4(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.01.09

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM), both Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM), remains a global health threat. The causes of T1DM are autoimmune destruction of β cells, whereas T2DM is caused by insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. Current treatments manage the disease but do not address the genetic or cellular abnormalities. CRISPR/Cas9 is an extremely potent gene editing tool that can potentially cure diabetes by correcting genetic mutations, controlling gene expression, and regenerating β cells. In the CRISPR systems of T1DM, CRISPR technology has been employed to create immune-evasive β-like cells from iPSCs by editing HLA genes and immune checkpoints. In T2DM, specific disease-causing genes such as TCF7L2, GLUT4, and SLC30A8 have been edited to improve insulin regulation. Further, editing of PPARG and FOXO1 has been found to improve insulin sensitivity and suppress hepatic glucose production. GCK (glucokinase), one of the important regulators of glucose sensing in β-cells, has also been a target to increase insulin secretion and normalise glucose homeostasis. The delivery systems are adeno-associated viruses, lipid nanoparticles, and electroporation, among others. Novel tools like Cpf1 improve editing efficiency, particularly in non-dividing cells. Nanocarriers have also improved delivery specificity and reduced degradation. Promising results have been seen with targeting metabolic enzymes like DPP-4 to preclude T2DM dysfunction. However, issues such as off-target effects, immune reactions, mosaicism, limitations in delivery, costs, and ethical viability still remain. Overcoming all these limitations, CRISPR-based approaches have high potential in overcoming treatment control for symptoms and offering long-term, possibly curative, diabetes therapies. Future research is required to refine delivery, enhance safety, and investigate long-term human effects.

https://doi.org/10.52340/jr.2026.04.01.09
PDF

References

Venkatraman S, S. Tharun S, Pavithra A, Amala R. Advancements in Gene Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Insights from CRISPR Cas9 Mediated Gene Editing and Insulin Production. In: Khullar M, Mittal A, Patil A, editors. Pharmaceutical Science [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2024 [cited 2026 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/88529 doi:10.5772/intechopen.112924

Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, et al. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 30;21(17):6275. doi:10.3390/ijms21176275

Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

Alam S, Hasan MdK, Neaz S, Hussain N, Hossain MdF, Rahman T. Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from Epidemiology, Biochemistry, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Complications and Comprehensive Management. Diabetology. 2021 Apr 16;2(2):36–50. doi:10.3390/diabetology2020004

Xue D, Narisu N, Taylor DL, Zhang M, Grenko C, Taylor HJ, et al. Functional interrogation of twenty type 2 diabetes-associated genes using isogenic human embryonic stem cell-derived β-like cells. Cell Metab. 2023 Nov;35(11):1897-1914.e11. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.09.013

Maxwell KG, Augsornworawat P, Velazco-Cruz L, Kim MH, Asada R, Hogrebe NJ, et al. Gene-edited human stem cell–derived β cells from a patient with monogenic diabetes reverse preexisting diabetes in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Apr 22;12(540):eaax9106. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aax9106

Low CY, Gan WL, Lai SJ, Tam RSM, Tan JF, Dietl S, et al. Critical updates on oral insulin drug delivery systems for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Jan 15;23(1):16. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-03062-7

Xu C, Lu Z, Luo Y, Liu Y, Cao Z, Shen S, et al. Targeting of NLRP3 inflammasome with gene editing for the amelioration of inflammatory diseases. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 5;9(1):4092. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06522-5

Cho EY, Ryu JY, Lee HAR, Hong SH, Park HS, Hong KS, et al. Lecithin nano-liposomal particle as a CRISPR/Cas9 complex delivery system for treating type 2 diabetes. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019 Dec;17(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12951-019-0452-8

Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Application of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018 Apr;27(4):740–56. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001

Saini K, Sharma S, Khan Y. DPP-4 inhibitors for treating T2DM - hype or hope? an analysis based on the current literature. Front Mol Biosci. 2023 May 23;10:1130625. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1130625

Gilbert MP, Pratley RE. GLP-1 Analogs and DPP-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Therapy: Review of Head-to-Head Clinical Trials. Front Endocrinol. 2020 Apr 3;11:178. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00178

Pohl C, Kiel JAKW, Driessen AJM, Bovenberg RAL, Nygård Y. CRISPR/Cas9 Based Genome Editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth Biol. 2016 Jul 15;5(7):754–64. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00082

Bevacqua RJ, Dai X, Lam JY, Gu X, Friedlander MSH, Tellez K, et al. CRISPR-based genome editing in primary human pancreatic islet cells. Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 23;12(1):2397. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22651-w

Guo D, Liu H, Gao G, Ruzi A, Wang K, Wu H, et al. Generation of an Abcc8 homozygous mutation human embryonic stem cell line using CRISPR/Cas9. Stem Cell Res. 2016 Nov;17(3):640–2. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2016.11.011

Bevacqua RJ, Zhao W, Merheb E, Kim SH, Marson A, Gloyn AL, et al. Multiplexed CRISPR gene editing in primary human islet cells with Cas9 ribonucleoprotein. iScience. 2024 Jan;27(1):108693. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108693

Wiley L, Cheek M, LaFar E, Ma X, Sekowski J, Tanguturi N, et al. The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns. HEC Forum. 2025 Jun;37(2):267–303. doi:10.1007/s10730-024-09538-1

Shinwari ZK, Tanveer F, Khalil AT. Ethical Issues Regarding CRISPR Mediated Genome Editing. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2018;103–10. doi:10.21775/cimb.026.103

Meagher KM, Allyse MA, Master Z, Sharp RR. Reexamining the Ethics of Human Germline Editing in the Wake of Scandal. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Feb;95(2):330–8. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.11.018

Ryczek N, Hryhorowicz M, Zeyland J, Lipiński D, Słomski R. CRISPR/Cas Technology in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation Research. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 21;22(6):3196. doi:10.3390/ijms22063196

Ayanoğlu FB, Elçi̇N AE, Elçi̇N YM. Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Turk J Biol. 2020 Apr 2;44(2):110–20. doi:10.3906/biy-1912-52

Cathomen T, Schüle S, Schüßler-Lenz M, Abou-El-Enein M. The Human Genome Editing Race: Loosening Regulatory Standards for Commercial Advantage? Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Feb;37(2):120–3. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.06.005

Rossant J. Gene editing in human development: ethical concerns and practical applications. Development. 2018 Aug 15;145(16):dev150888. doi:10.1242/dev.150888

Duardo-Sanchez A. CRISPR-Cas in Medicinal Chemistry: Applications and Regulatory Concerns. Curr Top Med Chem. 2018 Feb 9;17(30):3308–15. doi:10.2174/1568026618666171211151142

E R. Ethical Issues in Genome Editing using Crispr/Cas9 System. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2016;07(02). doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000266

Macintosh KL. Heritable Genome Editing and the Downsides of a Global Moratorium. CRISPR J. 2019 Oct 1;2(5):272–9. doi:10.1089/crispr.2019.0016

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.